What is the geometrical significance of definite integrals of vector functions?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion explores the geometrical significance of the definite integral of vector functions, particularly in the context of velocity. Integrating a velocity vector over time yields a displacement vector, indicating the particle's position change from t1 to t2. The resulting vector's direction reflects the particle's final position relative to its initial position. Participants note that while scalar functions have a clear area interpretation, vector functions represent distances traveled in three-dimensional space along the i, j, and k axes. The conversation highlights the complexity of finding a direct area interpretation for vector integrals compared to scalar integrals.
autodidude
Messages
332
Reaction score
0
What is the geometrical significance of the definite integral of a vector function if any?

e.g. if you integrate a vector function that gives the velocity of some particle between t1 and t2, the vector we get indicates the distance traveled in the i, j and k directions right? does the direction of this vector have any meaning? Also, is there a geometric interpretation of this value like area under the curve for the definite integral of a scalar function?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
specifically the integral of the velocity vector over time will give you the displacement vector, and the direction of this points in the direction of the particle's position at t2 relative to its position at t1.

I'm not sure what you want for a geometric interpretation. There are three curves and three areas- the distances traveled in each of the three directions of i, j and k.
 
Thanks. nah i was just wondering if there was somehow an area interpretation like with scalar functions
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Back
Top