Integrating a Vector Modulus: Dealing with Square Roots in Exponential Form

go4321
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I am trying to do this integral
\int_{-\infty}^{\infty}\frac{e^{-a| \vec{r}|}e^{-\vec{b}. \vec{r}}}{|\vec{r}|}
But if I write the modulus as
\vec{r}=\sqrt{x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}}
I can't figure out how to handle the annoying square root in the exponential.

Would be grateful for hints, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use spherical coordinates. Use the appropriate volume element.
 
arkajad said:
Use spherical coordinates. Use the appropriate volume element.

Doesn't the \vec{b}.\vec{r} term then become a horrible mess though?
Like b_{1}cos\theta sin \phi +b_{2}sin\theta sin \phi+... which is a pain because it is in the exponential so at best you can get it in the denominator of a fraction when you integrate r out.
 
You can use spherical coordinates for both b and r. Then use trygonometrical identities.
 
arkajad said:
You can use spherical coordinates for both b and r. Then use trygonometrical identities.

Hey, could I pester you again? I am still banging my head against the wall with this question. I have
<br /> \int_{0}^{2\pi} d\phi \int_{0}^{\pi} d\theta \int_{0}^{\infty} dr \, r \sin(\theta) \exp[r\{a+ib\left[\sin(\theta)\cos(\phi)\sin(b_{\theta})\cos(b_{\phi}))+\sin(\theta)\sin(\phi)\sin(b_{\theta})\sin(b_{\phi}))+\cos(\theta)\cos(b_{\theta}\right]\}]<br />

I just cannot find a trig identity that helps though. I tried integrating out r using<br /> \int_{0}^{\infty}xe^{-ax}=1/a^{2}but couldn't get anywhere that way either
 
First notice that the value of the integral is rotation independent (it depends only on absolute value of r and on the scalar product of b and r, both invariant under rotations. Therefore you can choose your coordinate system the way you like - the result will not change. So, choose it so that the vector b, which is kept constant during the integration, has coordinates (0,0,b), b positive.

Then the trigonometry part will be almost trivial.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top