Integrating an Expression with d(h³)/dt

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on integrating the expression dV/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2), which describes the change in fluid volume over time in a cone-shaped tank. The relationship between volume V and height h is established using trigonometric relations, leading to the expression (pi*R²/3*H²) d(h³)/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2). A key point is the necessity of applying the chain rule for differentiation, specifically dV/dt = dV/dh * dh/dt, to properly integrate the expression. Participants clarify that treating d(h³) as multiple integrals is incorrect, emphasizing the importance of the chain rule in this context. The integration approach is confirmed as correct with the application of these principles.
Marcos Domingues
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


[/B]
I have this expression: dV/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2); it describes a variation in time of a fluid volume V in a cone-shaped tank of total volume H*pi*R²/3;

By a trigonometric relation we get V = (pi*R²/3*H²)*h³; since tan a = H/R = h/r
where: R = radius of the tank; H = height of the tank; h = variable height of the fluid; r = radius related to a specific height h

So, when we replace V, we got the general expression (pi*R²/3*H²) d(h³)/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2);

This d(h³) term is the main problem on the integration. How do I integrate this expression?

Homework Equations



(pi*R²/3*H²) d(h³)/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2)

The Attempt at a Solution



Maybe consider d(h³) = dh*dh*dh and solve it as multiple integrals?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Marcos Domingues said:
So, when we replace V, we got the general expression (pi*R²/3*H²) d(h³)/dt = F0 - K*h^(1/2);
No, this wrong. You need to use the chain rule, i.e.
$$\frac{dV}{dt}=\frac{dV}{dh} \frac{dh}{dt}$$,
since ##V=V(h(t))##.
 
eys_physics said:
No, this wrong. You need to use the chain rule, i.e.
$$\frac{dV}{dt}=\frac{dV}{dh} \frac{dh}{dt}$$,
since ##V=V(h(t))##.

That's right. Thanks.
 
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Back
Top