Integrating by parts Maxwell Lagrangian

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on rewriting the free electromagnetic action integral using integration by parts. The user seeks clarification on transitioning from one line of the equation to another while managing the indices of the gauge fields correctly. They mention that surface terms can be disregarded but are unsure how to proceed with the integration process. Additionally, they inquire about any texts that might provide a derivation of this process. The conversation emphasizes the complexities of handling gauge field indices during integration by parts.
Lapidus
Messages
344
Reaction score
12
I attached a file that shows the free EM action integral and how it can be rewritten. I would like to know how to go from the first line to the second. I have to integrate by parts somehow, and I know surface terms get thrown out, but I do not know how the indices of the gauge fields should be handled.

thanks for any help
 

Attachments

Physics news on Phys.org
Has then perhaps anybody seen a text were it is derived?

I got -A∂∂A + A∂∂A, and both terms upper indices for A∂ and lower indices for ∂A. But what now? How to get to the last line?
 
Thread 'Motional EMF in Faraday disc, co-rotating magnet axial mean flux'
So here is the motional EMF formula. Now I understand the standard Faraday paradox that an axis symmetric field source (like a speaker motor ring magnet) has a magnetic field that is frame invariant under rotation around axis of symmetry. The field is static whether you rotate the magnet or not. So far so good. What puzzles me is this , there is a term average magnetic flux or "azimuthal mean" , this term describes the average magnetic field through the area swept by the rotating Faraday...
Back
Top