Integrating factors for 1st OLDE

Square1
Messages
143
Reaction score
1
So I just learned about these integrating factors and their utility in solving first order linear differential equations today. My mind is just kind of blown how it ends up simplifying the integration so much. Thats really pretty much the main thing I wanted to say... lol.

But also, how the hell are these kind of techniques discovered? Really (thats second question). Are they fluke coincidences that people just notice, "oh look multiply by e^integral of this P(x) through the expression and finding an answer to the equation is way easier!" Or is it more conscious implementation of some strategy, or noticing algebraic patterns. Anyone know about the history here? Is this all part ol Newtons package that he came up with? Sorry if the newbishness here is making some of you cringe lol. But i am just really amazed by this stuff.

Cheers
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Such things are discovered in much the way many things are discovered- try this, try that, until one works! (Then publish it not telling anyone about all the mis-steps so you look really smart.)

Any First order linear differential equation can be written in the form y'+ a(x)y= f(x). An "integrating factor" is a function, \mu(x) such that multiplying the left side of the equation makes left side a single derivative, (\mu(x)y)'.

Apply the product rule to that: (\mu(x)y)'= \mu y'+ \mu' y. Of course, the point is to have that equal to \mu(y'+ a(x)y)= \mu y'+ \mu a(x)y. Set them equal. \mu y'+ \mu' y= \mu y+ \mu a(x)y so the \mu y' terms cancel leaving \mu' y= \mu a(x)y which gives the separable equation for \mu, \mu'= a(x)\mu that is easy to solve.

Actually, any first order differential equation, linear or not, has an "integrating factor"- but it is only with linear equations that we can get a simple formula.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Haha I see I see. And what about the discovery of these integration factors? I always wonder how much of what I learn in class is the stuff that Newton or leibniz (and even some others I believe) had to work with?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top