Integrating Kinematics for Velocity from Acceleration: A Simplified Approach

yup790
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
When you want to get velocity from accelleration i have been told you integrate.

Howver v=at and so surley you can just multiply each term in the accelleratin expression by t.

ie:
a=4-0.2t

Surley you can just:
v=(4-0.2t)t
v=4t-0.2t2
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation v=at is for the situation when the acceleration is a constant. If it is a function of t, you have to integrate. In that case the corresponding equation is dv=a(t)dt, which gives the infinitesimal change in velocity, dv during infinitesimal time interval dt when the acceleration function a(t) is known. When integrating over a finite time interval, you effectively add a large number of small velocity changes dv to get the total change in velocity, Δv.
 
Last edited:
Thank you. Is there any proof for this. I learn better when I understand the theory behind a topic.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top