Integration by Parts: Evaluate ∫ 1 ÷ (16 + x2) dx

Christina-
Messages
11
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Use integration by parts to evaluate the integral:
∫ 1 ÷ (16 + x2) dx


Homework Equations


∫ u dv = uv - ∫ v u' du


The Attempt at a Solution


That's the problem, I don't know how to start. How would I divide up 1/(16 + x2) into two? So there would be a value for u and v'.

Maybe this isn't so much a question of how do you solve the integral, but how do you split the above polynomial. There's also tan in the answer, but I'm not sure how to get to that.
Any help to point me in the right direction would be greatly appreciated.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Are you sure the problem asks you to do this integral by parts?

The derivative of Arctg(x) is 1/(1 + x²) so simply factoring 1/16 then performing a change of variable y=x/4 gives the result.
 
It can be done by parts, but it's also interesting to do it by simple fraction expansion.
 
uneditable. See below.
 
Last edited:
Schrodinger's Dog said:
If I can do it either way then it must be easy :smile:

Spoiler:-

\int \frac{1}{16+x^2} => \frac {1}{16}+\frac{1}{x^2} =>\int \frac {1}{16}+x^{-2}

This is incorrect: \frac{1}{16+x^2}\neq\frac{1}{16}+\frac{1}{x^2}

substitute du.=arctan g(x) integrate using the sum rule and then simplify.:smile:

= \frac{1}{4}. tan^{-1}. \frac {4}{x}+C

There is an error here, it should read: = \frac{1}{4}. tan^{-1}. \frac {x}{4}+C
 
Last edited:
cristo said:
This is incorrect: \frac{1}{16+x^3}\neq\frac{1}{16}+\frac{1}{x^2}<br /> <br /> There is an error here, it should read: = \frac{1}{4}. tan^{-1}. \frac {x}{4}+C
<br /> Tell me about it. I keep trying to correct this but am getting nowhere fast. Thanks for the tex. I&#039;ll alter it so it reads correctly, my bad. I realized my mistake and have spent the last ten minutes trying to correct it bear with me.<br /> <br /> I can&#039;t edit it any further but you should end up with<br /> <br /> = \frac{1}{4}. tan^{-1}. \frac {x}{4}+C<br /> <br /> That was an hour well spent <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":smile:" title="Smile :smile:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":smile:" /> certainly learned a lot about editting <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":smile:" title="Smile :smile:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":smile:" /><br /> <br /> <blockquote data-attributes="" data-quote="dextercioby" data-source="post: 1230111" class="bbCodeBlock bbCodeBlock--expandable bbCodeBlock--quote js-expandWatch"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-title"> dextercioby said: </div> <div class="bbCodeBlock-content"> <div class="bbCodeBlock-expandContent js-expandContent "> It can be done by parts, but it&#039;s also interesting to do it by simple fraction expansion. </div> </div> </blockquote><br /> If I can do it either way then it must be easy <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f642.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":smile:" title="Smile :smile:" data-smilie="1"data-shortname=":smile:" /><br /> <br /> \int\frac{1}{(16+x^2)} = \frac{1}{16(1+1/16x^2)}<br /> <br /> It&#039;s pretty straight forward from here.<br /> <br /> Spoiler.<br /> <br /> \int \frac {1}{16}(1+x^2) where = \frac{1}{1+x^2}=tan^{-1}g(x)=&amp;gt;\frac{1}{4}. tan^{-1}. \frac {x}{4}+C<br /> <br /> Sorry <img src="https://cdn.jsdelivr.net/joypixels/assets/8.0/png/unicode/64/1f641.png" class="smilie smilie--emoji" loading="lazy" width="64" height="64" alt=":frown:" title="Frown :frown:" data-smilie="3"data-shortname=":frown:" />
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top