Integration help (expectation value)

Perillux
I'll skip the format because this isn't for a course, just a textbook I'm reading. Also because it shows the steps but I'm unsure about one of them. It might be a dumb question, but here goes:

It's for calculating \frac{d<p>}{dt} Using the momentum operator we have:

\frac{d}{dt}<p> = -i\hbar \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} \frac{\partial}{\partial t} (\Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x})dx

then I'm not entirely sure how they get the next step:

= -i\hbar \int_{-\infty}^{+\infty} [\frac{\partial}{\partial t}\Psi^* \frac{\partial \Psi}{\partial x} + \Psi^*\frac{\partial}{\partial x}(\frac{\partial\Psi}{\partial t})]dx

I know this is probably just some fundamental rule of integration. But I put the whole equations up anyway. Please just explain it to me. If it is just a rule I have to memorize would you possibly be able to point me somewhere that explains how they derive it?
Thank you.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
It's not a rule of integration, but rather a rule of differentiation, the product rule to be more precise.
 
Oh right! I should have known this... so ashamed. lol

ok, so I guess that \frac{\partial}{\partial t} and \frac{\partial}{\partial x} are interchangeable. They do it that way to set it up for the next step.

I knew I was going to slap myself on the forehead after seeing the answer... oh well.
Thank you.
 
Perillux said:
Oh right! I should have known this... so ashamed. lol

ok, so I guess that \frac{\partial}{\partial t} and \frac{\partial}{\partial x} are interchangeable. They do it that way to set it up for the next step.

I knew I was going to slap myself on the forehead after seeing the answer... oh well.
Thank you.
Don't be ashamed! To answer your question yes, if the function is sufficiently well behave, more specifically if all the mixed second order derivatives are continuous then the order of differentiation may be changed. I.e.

\Psi_{xt} = \Psi_{tx}
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top