Integration of an energy balance equation, with respect to time.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on integrating an energy balance equation involving gravitational potential energy, kinetic energy from a falling object, and rotational energy from a flywheel. The equation includes variables for mass, velocity, angular velocity, moment of inertia, and frictional torque. The user seeks assistance in integrating this equation with respect to time and considers relating velocity to angular velocity and expressing angular displacement as a function of time. A suggestion is made to separate variables and integrate after manipulating the equation. The user expresses gratitude for the guidance and plans to attempt the integration.
lukea125
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Hi Guys, I was hoping someone would be able to help me with this integration. It's been killing me haha.

I've got this energy balance equation:

mgh = 0.5m(v^2) + 0.5I(w^2) + T(theta)

Basically, It's a gravitational potential energy that is converted to a velocity of a falling object, a rotating flywheel and some frictional Torque (T). v is velocity, and w is angular velocity. I is the moment of inertia, which is known.

I need to integrate this expression with respect to time, t. I can relate velocity to angular velocity by: 0.0395w. I also thought I could express theta as angular velocity multiplied by time.

Any help would be greatly appreciated as I cannot get this out at all.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
welcome to pf!

hi lukea125! welcome to pf! :smile:

(have a theta: θ and an omega: ω :wink:)
lukea125 said:
I also thought I could express theta as angular velocity multiplied by time.

no :redface:

you have (dθ/dt)2 as a function of θ …

so square-root it, separate the variables, and integrate :wink:
 
Thanks Tiny-Tim! I really appreciate it. I'll give it a go and see what I can get.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...

Similar threads

Replies
13
Views
773
Replies
138
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Back
Top