Integration of quotient: Finding the Right Substitution

DryRun
Gold Member
Messages
837
Reaction score
4
Homework Statement
\int \frac{r^3-r^5}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}\,.dr

The attempt at a solution

The presence of \sqrt{1-r^2} suggests that i use the substitution r=sinθ

The integrand becomes: \frac{\sin^3\theta-\sin^5\theta}{\cos\theta}
\frac{dr}{d\theta}=\cos\theta
\int \frac{r^3-r^5}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}\,.dr=\int \sin^3\theta-\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta=\int\sin^3\theta\,.d\theta-\int\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta
Using the substitution u=cosθ
\int\sin^3\theta\,.d\theta=\frac{\cos^3\theta}{3}-\cos\theta
\int\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta=-\cos \theta+\frac{2\cos^3 \theta}{3}+\frac{\cos^5 \theta}{5}
\int\sin^3\theta\,.d\theta-\int\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta=-\frac{\cos^3 \theta}{3}-\frac{\cos^5 \theta}{5}
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Consider factoring the middle expression in the bottom line of your above post and then using a trigonometric identity on the resulting expression. Finally, return back from expressing your problem in terms of theta into an expression involving r. The final integral should be elementary.
 
You edited your post. My post above regards factoring the integrand sin^3 - sin^5. From there it should be easy.
 
Hi Syrus

Yes, I'm still trying to work it out, step by step, slowly.
 
hey sharks. i understand. But i think you should consider my post and follow where my hints lead you. From your edited post, looks like you may be going to unneccesary lengths to solve this one!
 
OK, so following your guidelines:
\int \sin^3\theta-\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta=\int\sin^3 \theta\cos^2 \theta\,.d\theta
Looks like i'll have to use substitution again to solve this.
Let u=cosθ
This gives:
\frac{\cos^5 \theta}{5}-\frac{\cos^3 \theta}{3}
Then, i have to replace r=sinθ into this integration result... It looks complicated again. I'm not sure I'm doing things right.
 
Last edited:
My apologies sharks, when i attempted the solution I was working too quickly and overlooked the fact that cosθdθ = dr and not dr = cos^2 dθ, as I had.
 
It's OK, Syrus. I'll try to figure it out.

From: \int\sin^3\theta\,.d\theta-\int\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta=-\frac{\cos^3 \theta}{3}-\frac{\cos^5 \theta}{5}
Reverting the previous substitution, r=sinθ, i get the final answer:
\frac{-5(1-r^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}-3(1-r^2)^{\frac{5}{2}}}{15}
This is the correct answer (or maybe they are equivalent, but i doubt it):
\frac{-1}{15}(1-r^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}(3r^2 +2)
 
Last edited:
sharks said:
Homework Statement
\int \frac{r^3-r^5}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}\,.dr

The attempt at a solution

The presence of \sqrt{1-r^2} suggests that i use the substitution r=sinθ

The integrand becomes: \frac{\sin^3\theta-\sin^5\theta}{\cos\theta}
\frac{dr}{d\theta}=\cos\theta
\int \frac{r^3-r^5}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}\,.dr=\int \sin^3\theta-\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta=\int\sin^3\theta\,.d\theta-\int\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta
Using the substitution u=cosθ
\int\sin^3\theta\,.d\theta=\frac{\cos^3\theta}{3}-\cos\theta
\int\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta=-\cos \theta+\frac{2\cos^3 \theta}{3}+\frac{\cos^5 \theta}{5}
\int\sin^3\theta\,.d\theta-\int\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta=-\frac{\cos^3 \theta}{3}-\frac{\cos^5 \theta}{5}

It's easier to simplify algebraically, then integrate by parts (no trig. sub.)

Start by observing that:
\int \frac{r^3-r^5}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}dr = \int \frac{r^3(1-r^2)}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}dr = \int {r^3}{\sqrt{1-r^2}}dr = \int (-\frac{1}{2}r^2)(-2r){\sqrt{1-r^2}}dr

Now put u = (-\frac{1}{2}r^2) and dv = (-2r){\sqrt{1-r^2}}\,.dr into the integration by parts formula \int udv + \int vdu = uv and everything should become clearer.
 
Last edited:
  • #10
sharks said:
It's OK, Syrus. I'll try to figure it out.

From: \int\sin^3\theta\,.d\theta-\int\sin^5\theta\,.d\theta=-\frac{\cos^3 \theta}{3}-\frac{\cos^5 \theta}{5}
Reverting the previous substitution, r=sinθ, i get the final answer:
\frac{-5(1-r^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}-3(1-r^2)^{\frac{5}{2}}}{15}
This is the correct answer (or maybe they are equivalent, but i doubt it):
\frac{-1}{15}(1-r^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}(3r^2 +2)

Not equivalent. Definitely a sign error and at least one coefficient error there. Please try and use the algebraic method, it's much quicker and neater, I assure you.
 
  • #11
Hi Curious3141

Your method isn't really orthodox but i guess it's better than nothing. So, here are my calculations:
\int udv = uv - \int vdu
uv=\frac{-r^2(1-r^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}{3}
\int v.du=\int\frac{-2r}{3}(1-r^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}=\frac{2(1-r^2)^{\frac{5}{2}}}{15}
 
Last edited:
  • #12
sharks said:
Hi Curious3141

Your method isn't really orthodox but i guess it's better than nothing. So, here are my calculations:
\int udv = uv - \int vdu
uv=\frac{-r^2(1-r^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}{3}
\int v.du=\int\frac{-2r}{3}(1-r^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}

"Orthodox"?! What's that?:smile: I would say working this out with a direct algebraic method would be considered more "orthodox" than trying complicated trig subs.

You've worked out uv and \int vdu correctly (except you forgot the dr element in the latter integral).

But you forgot to integrate v with respect to u to evaluate \int vdu!

I see you've edited your earlier post. I'm assuming it's a work in progress, so I'll let you finish. Remember to do the full algebraic simplification (gather together common factors) of the final form to make it look like the form you quoted (presumably from the online Wolfram integrator).
 
  • #13
\int udv = \frac{-r^2(1-r^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}}{3}-\frac{2(1-r^2)^{\frac{5}{2}}}{15}=(1-r^2)^{\frac{3}{2}}.-\frac{3r^2+2}{15}
Finally, the correct answer. I suppose that the standard recognition methods don't apply in this case, as the algebraic manipulation isn't so obvious, at least to me.:redface:
 
  • #14
sharks said:
"Orthodox"
Code:
[PLAIN]http://thesaurus.com/browse/orthodox
[/PLAIN]

Yes, *I* know what "orthodox" means, thank you :rolleyes:, I'm asking what *you* mean when you say my method isn't "orthodox"?

The algebraic method is perfectly acceptable and more direct, and, ideally, you should've recognised the pattern (which is fairly obvious, to be honest). You'll probably be able to do it with more practice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #15
In my notes, the integration examples are more directly solved, by applying the various integration formulas rather than algebraic manipulation (which seems a bit risky to me as it's like trial and error, especially in tests and exams where time is very limited). After reviewing your method, it is indeed easier. I'll need to practice more and be more confident. Thank you for your help.
 
  • #16
sharks said:
In my notes, the integration examples are more directly solved, by applying the various integration formulas rather than algebraic manipulation. After reviewing your method, it is indeed easier. I'll need to practice more and be more confident. Thank you for your help.

No worries, glad to be of help. :smile:
 
  • #17
hi everyone! :smile:

substituting u = 1 - r2 is easier :wink:
 
  • #18
tiny-tim said:
hi everyone! :smile:

substituting u = 1 - r2 is easier :wink:

Do you mean u^2 = 1 - r^2? Because that one's dead easy. :biggrin:

Thanks for spotting it. Sharks - you should definitely use this sub. instead. Practically a four-step solution.
 
  • #19
Curious3141 said:
Do you mean u^2 = 1 - r^2?

either will do :biggrin:
 
  • #20
Thanks for the suggestion, tiny-tim. I tested the substitution u^2 = 1 - r^2 and got the answer. It is indeed quicker, but since there's no set method for figuring out how to find that lucky substitution... I guess i'll stick to the safe (and more difficult) road.
 
Last edited:
  • #21
hi sharks! :smile:
sharks said:
… since there's no set method for figuring out how to find that lucky substitution...

actually, there is …

when you see a function g(f(x)) (in this case, f(x) = 1 - r2), first look for the derivative f'(x) (in this case, 2r), and see if you can write the whole thing as f'(x)g(f(x)), or as a sum of such expressions (with different g in each) …

in this case, you should be able to write the original as a sum ∑f'(x)(f(x))n/2 :wink:
 
Back
Top