A Integration with Euler angle of rotation matrixes

RiceSweet
Messages
5
Reaction score
2
Hello, I was struggling with solving a specific integral. I know that I can rewrite the exponential matrices and the range of the three Euler angles. However, I am not sure I should I write
Screenshot 2018-11-24 00.08.05.png
in terms those three Euler angles.

Screenshot 2018-11-24 00.10.35.png
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2018-11-24 00.08.05.png
    Screenshot 2018-11-24 00.08.05.png
    1.1 KB · Views: 940
  • Screenshot 2018-11-24 00.10.35.png
    Screenshot 2018-11-24 00.10.35.png
    9.7 KB · Views: 1,578
Physics news on Phys.org
There is something fishy here. Both your matrices have determinant 0!
 
RiceSweet said:
Hello, I was struggling with solving a specific integral. I know that I can rewrite the exponential matrices and the range of the three Euler angles. However, I am not sure I should I write View attachment 234555 in terms those three Euler angles.

View attachment 234556
Sorry that I made a mistake for one of mine matrix. The matrix of Sz should like as follows
Screenshot 2018-11-30 13.39.10.png
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2018-11-30 13.39.10.png
    Screenshot 2018-11-30 13.39.10.png
    3.8 KB · Views: 821
Svein said:
There is something fishy here. Both your matrices have determinant 0!
Hello, thanks for your reply. I made a mistake of Sz matrix, and I just updated the correct matrix. Those two matrices do have a determine as well as trace equal to 0 because those matrices are the matrix representation of Sz and S^2 operator of spin 1/2 1/2 system in Quantum Mechanics. The three exponential inside the integral represents the rotation.
 
So your rotations are non-invertible?
 
Svein said:
So your rotations are non-invertible?
Yes, because those rotations are acting on spins. For example, if We act this rotation operator related to Sz on an eigenstate |00>, we will get e^(0) = 1 as our result, and we can not reverse our process. Since our eigenvalue of |00> corresponding to the Sz operator is just 0.
 
Svein said:
So your rotations are non-invertible?
I have the general expansion form of the rotation operator already. The problem that I am struggling with is that I didn't know how to break down the derivative of this Euler angle vector (theta), and do the right integral.
Screenshot 2018-11-30 16.11.55.png
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot 2018-11-30 16.11.55.png
    Screenshot 2018-11-30 16.11.55.png
    3.6 KB · Views: 728
Mathematically your expression does not make sense.

Since I never studied quantum mechanics, I cannot comment on whatever goes on backstage. I have, however, spent a couple of years working on robot arm coordinate transforms and I am therefore fully conversant with coordinate transform matrices.
 
Back
Top