Integrationg over exp with two variables

  • Thread starter Thread starter cutesteph
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Variables
cutesteph
Messages
62
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


f(x,y) = exp(-x^2 +xy -y^2)

transform with
x =(1/sqrt(2)) *(u – v), y = (1/sqrt(2))* (u + v) .


Homework Equations



Jacobian

The Attempt at a Solution



Jacobian = 1

f(u,v) = exp(-(u^2)/2 -(3v^2/2)

double integral f(u,v) du dv

the bounds would be x > 0 => ( u-v) >0 => u > v
and x < ∞ => u < ∞

v > 0 to v < ∞

I am lost on what to do next. If anyone can be as kind as to help, I would greatly appreciate it!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hi there cutesteph! :smile:

(try using the X2 button just above the Reply box :wink:)

what are your limits for x and y ? :confused:

i'll assume they're both from 0 to ∞

draw the region (in x,y), and mark a grid of lines of equal u and v

u goes from 0 to ∞

for each value of u, where does v go from and to? :wink:
 
So the limits v from 0 to infinity and u from -v to v.

∫0 to∞ exp(-u2/2)∫-u to u exp(-3v2/2) dv du
 
cutesteph said:
So the limits v from 0 to infinity and u from -v to v.

isn't it the other way round?
 
cutesteph said:

Homework Statement


f(x,y) = exp(-x^2 +xy -y^2)

transform with
x =(1/sqrt(2)) *(u – v), y = (1/sqrt(2))* (u + v) .


Homework Equations



Jacobian

The Attempt at a Solution



Jacobian = 1

f(u,v) = exp(-(u^2)/2 -(3v^2/2)

double integral f(u,v) du dv

the bounds would be x > 0 => ( u-v) >0 => u > v
and x < ∞ => u < ∞

v > 0 to v < ∞

I am lost on what to do next. If anyone can be as kind as to help, I would greatly appreciate it!

You never actually answered the question about the limits on x and y, and without your answer I cannot possibly tell what are the limits on u and v. However, you can determine the latter for yourself by noting that
u = \frac{x+y}{\sqrt{2}}, \; v = \frac{y-x}{\sqrt{2}}
If you know the ranges of x and y you can figure out the ranges on u and v.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top