Intensity from the double slit.

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around deriving an expression for the intensity of laser light from a double slit setup, specifically focusing on the effects of slit width and spacing on the resulting intensity pattern as a function of angle. The participants are exploring the relationship between single and double slit diffraction patterns.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the derivation of the intensity expression, questioning the appearance of a prefactor of 4 in the formula. There is also inquiry into how the formula simplifies when the distance between slits equals the slit width.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights regarding the definition of the intensity prefactor and its implications for the intensity expression. There is ongoing exploration of how specific conditions, such as setting d equal to a, affect the resulting intensity pattern.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering the implications of defining the maximal intensity in different contexts and questioning the expected outcomes when the slit spacing equals the slit width. There is a noted correction regarding the interpretation of the single slit width in relation to the double slit pattern.

sg001
Messages
134
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Laser light of wavelength λ is incident onto a pair of narrow slits of width a and spacing dWrite down an expression for the intensity as a function of angle of the angle measured from the central axis, θ, in the far-*‐field

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I thought it was just the product of single and double slit diffraction, i.e...

I= I0cos2(∏dsinθ/λ)(sin(∏asinθ/λ)/∏asinθ/λ))2but the answer was I= 4I0cos2(∏dsinθ/λ)(sin(∏asinθ/λ)/∏asinθ/λ))2im not sure where this 4 has come from??

also how would I show if d=a then this formula turns into the double slit pattern.??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The prefactor depends on the definition of I0.
If you define it as "maximal intensity with a double-slit", the prefactor is 1.
If you define it as "maximal intensity with a single slit", it is 4.

also how would I show if d=a then this formula turns into the double slit pattern.??
If the distance between the slit centers is equal to the slit size, why would you expect a double slit pattern?
 
mfb said:
The prefactor depends on the definition of I0.
If you define it as "maximal intensity with a double-slit", the prefactor is 1.
If you define it as "maximal intensity with a single slit", it is 4.


If the distance between the slit centers is equal to the slit size, why would you expect a double slit pattern?

Thanks,

sorry it should have been single slit with width 2a... but when I plug in d=a I can't see how that could disappear?
 
With ##x=\frac{\pi a \sin(\theta)}{\lambda}##:

$$I= I_0\cos^2\left(\frac{\pi d \sin(\theta)}{\lambda}\right) \frac{sin^2(x)}{x^2}$$
With d=a and using sin(2x)=2sin(x)cos(x):
$$I= I_0 \frac{\cos^2(x) sin^2(x)}{x^2} = I_0 \frac{1}{4} \frac{sin^2(2x)}{x^2} = I_0 \frac{sin^2(2x)}{(2x)^2}$$
Which is the single-slit pattern with 2a.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K