Intensity in a Double-Slit problem?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a double-slit interference problem from an exam, specifically addressing the equation I = I0cos^2(phi) and the confusion around doubling intensity. The initial misunderstanding involved attempting to set cos^2(phi) equal to 2, which is impossible. Clarification was provided that the intensity at points of maximum constructive interference can be calculated, leading to an intensity of 2*I0. Ultimately, the correct approach involves recognizing that the total intensity is the sum of individual intensities, which can be plotted for better understanding. The problem was resolved by identifying the correct relationship between intensity and position in the interference pattern.
Newtime
Messages
347
Reaction score
0
I've been looking over an old exam for one of my classes, and cannot decipher the train of thought used in solving (or method used) the problem on the last page:

http://people.physics.tamu.edu/kochar/FE/FE_Fall05_1.pdf

Specifically, for the first part, what is going on...? Firstly, I have the equation that I = I0cos^2(phi). So if I want the intensity doubled then I end up with cos^2(phi) = 2, which isn't possible? Clearly I am thinking about this in the entirely wrong way and could use some help, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it means just where there is positive interference. Which would be approximately y = m*lamba*L/d. m=1,2,3...
 
The intensities add up, so if you get intensity I_0 from one beam and the same from another beam you get 2*I_0 at the point where there is maximum constructive interference.
 
Nevermind, I figured it out.
 
kcdodd said:
I think it means just where there is positive interference. Which would be approximately y = m*lamba*L/d. m=1,2,3...

That was my first thought, but turns out it was in correct. The answer happens to be what you posted above for m=1 but all divided by 4 since the intensity equals the sum of the individual intensities and the point one fourth of the way from the center point of the interference pattern to the center point of the first bright spot - the formula you gave. if you plot the intensity function, this becomes quite clear. but thank you for your reply.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top