Intensity in a Double-Slit problem?

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around solving a double-slit interference problem from an exam, specifically addressing the equation I = I0cos^2(phi) and the confusion around doubling intensity. The initial misunderstanding involved attempting to set cos^2(phi) equal to 2, which is impossible. Clarification was provided that the intensity at points of maximum constructive interference can be calculated, leading to an intensity of 2*I0. Ultimately, the correct approach involves recognizing that the total intensity is the sum of individual intensities, which can be plotted for better understanding. The problem was resolved by identifying the correct relationship between intensity and position in the interference pattern.
Newtime
Messages
347
Reaction score
0
I've been looking over an old exam for one of my classes, and cannot decipher the train of thought used in solving (or method used) the problem on the last page:

http://people.physics.tamu.edu/kochar/FE/FE_Fall05_1.pdf

Specifically, for the first part, what is going on...? Firstly, I have the equation that I = I0cos^2(phi). So if I want the intensity doubled then I end up with cos^2(phi) = 2, which isn't possible? Clearly I am thinking about this in the entirely wrong way and could use some help, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it means just where there is positive interference. Which would be approximately y = m*lamba*L/d. m=1,2,3...
 
The intensities add up, so if you get intensity I_0 from one beam and the same from another beam you get 2*I_0 at the point where there is maximum constructive interference.
 
Nevermind, I figured it out.
 
kcdodd said:
I think it means just where there is positive interference. Which would be approximately y = m*lamba*L/d. m=1,2,3...

That was my first thought, but turns out it was in correct. The answer happens to be what you posted above for m=1 but all divided by 4 since the intensity equals the sum of the individual intensities and the point one fourth of the way from the center point of the interference pattern to the center point of the first bright spot - the formula you gave. if you plot the intensity function, this becomes quite clear. but thank you for your reply.
 
Topic about reference frames, center of rotation, postion of origin etc Comoving ref. frame is frame that is attached to moving object, does that mean, in that frame translation and rotation of object is zero, because origin and axes(x,y,z) are fixed to object? Is it same if you place origin of frame at object center of mass or at object tail? What type of comoving frame exist? What is lab frame? If we talk about center of rotation do we always need to specified from what frame we observe?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
7K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
8K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K