Intensity of a reflected and transmitted light

  • Thread starter Thread starter sapz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensity Light
sapz
Messages
33
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Hello!

This is really a simple question about how to use reflection and transmittance coefficients.

I have a light ray of intensity I0 comming (S-polarized) to a glass surface at a certain angle, like in the picture:
illus2up.png


I want to find the intensity of the reflected wave and of the transmitted-into-the-glass wave.

I have calculated the coefficient T_{\perp}. Is it true to say, that the intensity of the transmitted wave is I_0*T_{\perp}, and the intensity of the reflected wave is I_0*R_{\perp} = I_0*(1-T_{\perp})?

Homework Equations



This is how I calculated the coefficient:
t_{\perp} = \frac{2n_1Cos\theta_i}{n_iCos\theta_i+n_tCos\theta_t}

T_{\perp} = \frac{n_tCos\theta_t}{n_iCos\theta_i}t_{\perp}^2

Where n-i, n-t are the indexes of the air and glass, and the angles are as in the picture: theta-i is the hitting angle, and theta-t is the transmittance angle.

Thank you (:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am aware there are two coefficients of each, actually there are 4: Rs,rs,Rp,rp,Ts,ts,Tp,tp.
And yeah, I'm not sure of how to use the coefficients... this is why I ask it here.

I've already seen these links before I asked and they refer to lower-case-coefficients which I think are proportional to the amplitudes , except the Wiki link from which I could not deduce anything about how to use it to get the intensity.
I ask about the upper case coefficient Tp because I think it should be proportional to the intensities.
I know I don't know, and I did a fare share of googling before posting here.
 
The power transmission coefficient (or transmittance) is defined as the ratio of the transmitted and incident light intensities: T=I(transmitted)/I(incident) . In the same way, the power reflection coefficient or reflectance is R=I(reflected)/I(incident).

Intensity of light is the energy flowing through a unit area which is perpendicular to the light beam, in unit time. It is the energy density multiplied by the speed of light.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intensity_(physics)

Anything that can transmit energy can have an intensity associated with it. For an electromagnetic wave, if E is the complex amplitude of the electric field, then the time-averaged energy density of the wave is given by

\left \langle U \right \rangle= \frac{n^2 \epsilon_0}{2} |E|^2 ,

and the intensity is obtained by multiplying this expression by the velocity of the wave, c/n:

I = \frac{c n \epsilon_0}{2} |E|^2

where n is the refractive index, c is the speed of light in vacuum and \epsilon_0 is the vacuum permittivity.

The low-case letters t and r mean the amplitude transmission and reflection coefficients.

They are defined as the ratio of the complex amplitude of the electric field in the transmitted or in the reflected beam to the amplitude of the incident beam. Sometimes they use the amplitudes of the electric field for S polarization and the amplitudes of the magnetic field in case of P polarization.

ehild
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes 1 person
Thank you ehild
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top