Intensity, Radius (Calculations)

AI Thread Summary
A point source of sound emits energy uniformly, and when the intensity is halved, the listener must adjust their distance to maintain the same perceived loudness. The intensity of sound is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source, leading to the conclusion that if intensity decreases by half, the listener must move closer by a factor of the square root of two. The calculations indicate that to compensate for the reduced intensity, the listener should move to a distance of r/(2^(1/2)). This adjustment accounts for the relationship between intensity and distance, ensuring the sound remains equally loud. Understanding these principles is crucial for solving similar sound intensity problems.
Gunman
Messages
25
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


A point source of sound emits energy equally in all directions at a constant rate and a person 8m from the source listens. After a while, the intensity of the source is halved. If the person wishes the sound to be seem as loud as before, how far should he be now?


Homework Equations


intensity is inversely proportional to radius(distance from the source)


The Attempt at a Solution


I = (K)/(r^2)
I*(r^2)=K
So i presumed that since K has to be constant, and I has been halved. The radius would be (2)^(1/2). So why isn't the answer (2^(1/2))r ? I can understand that the answer is not correct because it is not possible for the intensity to be the same when the radius has increased. So can someone point out to me which part I went wrong? Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since they are inversely proportional the person needs to get closer by some factor. If it were simply

I \alpha \frac{K}{r}

and the intensity dropped by a factor of two then that is the equivalent of saying that the person went twice as far away, so in the case of the intensity of source being independent then to keep the same sound the person would half to cancel it out by going r/2.

Now in the case of it being inversely proportional to the square of the radius, if the intensity decreases by a half, it could have happened because someone traveled 2^(1/2) away, so if it were actually the source that decreased by a half then the person can cancel that effect just as if they could have caused it by doing the opposite, and traveling 2^(1/2) closer (i.e. r/(2^1/2)).

If it helps to see the algebra in addition to the qualitative observations here is how it would go for the two:
I \alpha \frac{1}{2} \frac{K}{r/2} = \frac{k}{r}

I \alpha \frac{1}{2} \frac{K}{(r/\sqrt{2})^2} = \frac{k}{r^2}
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanged mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top