Intercepts in quadric surfaces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter yoohyojinn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Surfaces
yoohyojinn
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
Intercepts in quadric surfaces??

Homework Statement



How many intercepts can an ellipsoid have?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




First of all, I don't understand what exactly "an intercept" means in quadric surfaces.

in two dimensions, intercepts are the points that the graph meets with x&y axes.

So in three dimensions, do intercepts still mean the points that the surface meets with x,y,z axes?

if what I understand is right, an ellipsoid can have at least 0 intercept, and at most 6 intercepts.

And an elliptic parabaloid can have at least 1 intercept, and at most 6 intercepts.

is it right??

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org


yoohyojinn said:

Homework Statement



How many intercepts can an ellipsoid have?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution




First of all, I don't understand what exactly "an intercept" means in quadric surfaces.

in two dimensions, intercepts are the points that the graph meets with x&y axes.

So in three dimensions, do intercepts still mean the points that the surface meets with x,y,z axes?

if what I understand is right, an ellipsoid can have at least 0 intercept, and at most 6 intercepts.
Seems reasonble to me.
yoohyojinn said:
And an elliptic parabaloid can have at least 1 intercept, and at most 6 intercepts.
I think that 6 is too many - I don't see how it could have more than 5 intercepts.
yoohyojinn said:
is it right??

Thanks.
 


oh yes, yes, yes, you are right.

I was confused with visualizing it.

an elliptic paraboloid can have at most 5 intercepts.

thanks.
 


What if it was an elliptic paraboloid which was rotated so that its axis of revolution was not parallel to an axis? Couldn't it then achieve 6 intercepts?
 


that sounds right
 


alanlu said:
What if it was an elliptic paraboloid which was rotated so that its axis of revolution was not parallel to an axis? Couldn't it then achieve 6 intercepts?
I thought about that possibility (briefly), but it didn't seem to make a difference. If you spend more time at it than I did, you might be able to come up with a scenario in which there are 6 intercepts for the paraboloid.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top