B Interested to see how others do simple algebraic manipulations

  • B
  • Thread starter Thread starter etotheipi
  • Start date Start date
etotheipi
I've discussed this with a few people and I've found it pretty interesting (ok, maybe not that interesting, but still...) how there's quite a bit of difference in internal thought process for performing the bog-standard algebraic manipulations/rearrangements that come up all of the time.

For instance, I'll tend to think of an equation in the form of two fractions (ignoring the 1's on the denominators, though I've put them in for clarity), and will just "slide" the quantities across either of the diagonals, since I've thought this is a pretty quick method:

##(c^{2}) = (a^{2} + b^{2} - 2ab\cos{\theta})##

##\frac{(c^{2} - a^{2} - b^{2})}{1} = \frac{-2ab\cos{\theta}}{1} \implies \frac{1}{-2ab} = \frac{\cos{\theta}}{(c^{2} - a^{2} - b^{2})}## etc.

I was wondering if there were any methods that anyone else tends to use that are more efficient? Sorry for the rather broad question!
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Yes, but is this really something you "imagine"? What you are doing is basically how we define fractions, not much of a trick or something like that is going on here.

Perhaps I miss the point of the question?
 
Math_QED said:
Yes, but is this really something you "imagine"? What you are doing is basically how we define fractions, not much of a trick or something like that is going on here.

Perhaps I miss the point of the question?

I've just re-read my own question and have realized that there isn't actually any substance to it. I can't actually remember what I was thinking when I wrote it... please ignore this thread from now on!
 
etotheipi said:
I've just re-read my own question and have realized that there isn't actually any substance to it. I can't actually remember what I was thinking when I wrote it... please ignore this thread from now on!

Hi etotheipi,
Were you maybe thinking about whether we divide through to eliminate terms initially, or manipulate the expression in terms of what we want to find before doing so?

Don't discourage yourself; now that I think about it I'm sure people do it in different ways!

CS :)
 
  • Wow
Likes etotheipi
The first thing I would think about before doing any algebraic manipulations is what my purpose was- what I wanted to end with. You appear to have gone from c^2= a^2+ b^2- 2abcos(\theta) to \frac{1}{-2ab}= \frac{cos(\theta)}{c^2- a^2- b^2}. To what purpose? You say "etc." so you intend to go further. What is your purpose?

For example, if I wanted to solve c^2= a^2+ b^2- 2abcos(\theta) for \theta[/theta, in terms of a, b, and c, I would start by subtracting a^2+ b^2 from each side to get c^2- a^2- b^2= 2ab cos(\theta) and then divide both sides by 2ab to get cos(\theta)= \frac{c^2- a^2- b^2}{2ab}.

If I wanted to solve for a, in terms of b, c, and \theta I would do quite different algebra. I would write c^2= a^2+ b^2- 2ab cos(\theta) as a^2- 2bcos(\theta) a+ b^2- c^2= 0 and solve that quadratic equation using the "quadratic formula": a= \frac{2b cos(\theta)\pm\sqrt{4b^2cos^2(\theta)- 4(b^2- c^2)}}{2}= 2bcos(\theta)\pm\sqrt{b^2cos^2(\theta)- b^2+ c^2}.
 
  • Like
Likes etotheipi
Thank you @HallsofIvy, I'd say I use the same approach. The context behind this is being able to do the manipulations mentally; although we could write down all the steps, I've found that the technique of shifting the different terms i.e. along the diagonals makes it much easier to do the rearrangement without paper. Yet I'm sure other techniques are available.
 
  • Like
Likes charminglystrange
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top