Interference: Resultant intensity.

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around deriving the resultant intensity of two interfering waves with intensities I1 and I2, given their phase difference δ. The key equation to prove is I = I1 + I2 + 2*sqrt(I1*I2)*cos(δ), which relates intensity to amplitude. Participants emphasize the importance of understanding that intensity is proportional to the square of amplitude and that amplitudes can be treated as vectors. One user expresses difficulty in applying this knowledge to find the resultant amplitude when the amplitudes are not equal. The conversation highlights the need for a clearer grasp of vector addition in the context of wave interference.
physlol
Messages
3
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



To waves with the same frequency interfere. The intensity of the two waves are I1 and I2. Show that the resultant intensity is:

I = I1 +I2 + 2*sqrt(I1*I2)*cos(δ)

Where δ is the phase difference between the two waves.

Hint: Use the relation between intensity and amplitude.

Homework Equations



None given, except the one above.

The Attempt at a Solution



Tried alot, but i really don't have a clue. Firstly: What is the relation between intensity and amplitude?

And I'm sorry for my language. English, as well as physics obviously, are not mye favourite subjects :)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi physlol, welcome to PF.
You have said that you tried a lot, but you have not shown any attempt. Even you have not opened the textbook to see the relation between intensity and amplitude.
Amplitudes behave like vectors. Do you know how to find the resultant of two vectors having an angle θ between?
Collect these information and come back. We will helpyou.
 
rl.bhat said:
You have said that you tried a lot, but you have not shown any attempt. Even you have not opened the textbook to see the relation between intensity and amplitude.

Yes, I did try. Yes, I have opened my textbook( Physics for scientists and engineers, Tipler & Mosca). But I did not find anything that helped me. So I've been sitting here, trying to get something usefull out of playing around with formulas that i don't have think will work.

rl.bhat said:
Amplitudes behave like vectors.

This I did not know. I don't know how this would help me, though.

rl.bhat said:
Do you know how to find the resultant of two vectors having an angle θ between?

Yes.
 
Well. I am surprised to know that in the interference chapter they are not discussing the relation between intensity and amplitude, constructive and destructive interference.
Any way intensity is proportional to square of amplitude.
If two wave have A1 and A2 with pηase difference δ, find the resultant amplitude.
Then convert this into intensity.
 
Thanks for the reply.

I am able to prove that the equation is correct if both the amplitudes that interfere are equal by using A2 = p0 + Cos(0,5*δ).

But they do not have to be equal i assume, and therefor I am kinda lost on how to come up with an expression for the resultant amplitude that I can convert to intensity.

I am sorry if there is something obvious that I have overlooked, but physics is really not my strongest subject.
 
You have told that you know how to find the resultant of two vectors.
Find the resultant of vector A1 and A2 having angle between them δ.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top