Intermediate analysis homework

  • Thread starter Thread starter Shackleford
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis Homework
Shackleford
Messages
1,649
Reaction score
2
For (c), it looks like this set goes off to negative and positive infinity.

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n149/camarolt4z28/IMG_20110904_125145.jpg

For (e), I think this is right. Since r is in the rationals, r gets arbitrarily close to the square root of 5, so there are no particular numbers that are the min, max of the set. Also, since r is in the rationals, there is no particular number that is the sup or inf.

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n149/camarolt4z28/IMG_20110904_125117.jpg

For (f) and (g), the "limit" of the intersection and union appears to be the open interval (0,1). If that's the case, the answers should be the same. Since it is an open interval, 0 and 1 are not elements of the set, so there is no particular number that is the min, max. But, I could say 0 and 1 are the inf and sup, respectively. I'm not too sure about this.

http://i111.photobucket.com/albums/n149/camarolt4z28/IMG_20110904_125132.jpg
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
C looks right, I'm pretty sure if you don't have a sup or inf, then you can't have a min or max.

I can't help you out with F and G. But, look at E again, you sure about that? Start by writing out some actual numbers within that set.
 
mohaque said:
C looks right, I'm pretty sure if you don't have a sup or inf, then you can't have a min or max.

I can't help you out with F and G. But, look at E again, you sure about that? Start by writing out some actual numbers within that set.

Yes. I'm sure on (e). The smallest and largest number you could have is -sqrt5 and sqrt 5. However, since r is in the rationals, that's not a valid number. You can always find a rational number that's arbitrarily close to sqrt 5. So, there is no min and max. But, I guess I could say the inf and sup are -sqrt 5 and sqrt 5, respectively.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top