Internal energy pressure dependence

AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around the challenges of calculating enthalpy in a refrigerant 134a enthalpy-pressure diagram. The user, Mike, notes discrepancies in his program's enthalpy calculations compared to a referenced diagram, particularly in the liquid state where temperature curves are not vertical as expected. He questions how specific enthalpy can remain nearly constant despite significant pressure increases, suggesting that internal energy (u) may be dependent on pressure. The response confirms that u is indeed a function of pressure, providing a formula that explains the relationship between enthalpy, specific volume, and temperature. This clarification helps Mike move forward with his implementation.
MLars
Messages
2
Reaction score
0
Hello Physics Forums!

I am currently writing a computer program that displays an enthalpy-pressure diagram for the refrigerant 134a. I am using the data and relation between specific volume, pressure and temperature found in http://eng.sut.ac.th/me/2014/document/LabMechanical1/HFC-134a_SI.pdf. My algorithm is able to calculate the correct volume given a pressure and temperature, however the total enthalpy calculation differs from the diagram found in the above paper.

upload_2015-12-11_22-8-55.png


In particular, in the liquid state, my temperature curves are not that vertical but fall to the right as pressure increases. According to my understanding of specific enthalpy it is defined as h=u+pv where u is a function of only temperature. Now to my question. If the above is true, how can the lines in the diagram be almost vertical when the specific volume is close to constant and the pressure increases by a factor of 10(pv should increase x10). May u be dependent on pressure, compensate for the increasing pv and yield a constant enthalpy? What am I missing?

Thanks a lot
Mike
 
Physics news on Phys.org
u is a function of pressure. The effect of pressure on h is given by:

$$\left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial P}\right)_T=v-T\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)_P$$
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes MLars
Chestermiller said:
u is a function of pressure. The effect of pressure on h is given by:

$$\left(\frac{\partial h}{\partial P}\right)_T=v-T\left(\frac{\partial v}{\partial T}\right)_P$$
Alright, nice to have that confirmed! I'll start to implement it.

Thank you Chestermiller:)
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top