Are Your Moment Calculations for Bent Bar Reactions Correct?

  • Thread starter Thread starter whereitsbeen
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Internal Reactions
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on correcting moment calculations for a bent bar's internal reactions. The original poster, Mike, has identified some forces correctly but is struggling with moment calculations, leading to discrepancies in expected results. Key feedback emphasizes the importance of correctly identifying force directions and the fixed connection at point A. Additionally, it highlights that the moment of a force is determined by the force's magnitude multiplied by the perpendicular distance from its line of action to the point of interest. The conversation stresses the need for clarity in calculations and adherence to equilibrium principles for accurate results.
whereitsbeen
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Calculate the internal reactions for the member shown at the sections indicated;
picture attached with FBD's

I have the V & F forces correct but my moments are off. Can you point me in the right direction here?

V M-M = 2k
F M-M =-0.5k

V N-N = -2k
F N-N = 0.5k

M M-M = -10k (2) + 0.5k (2) + 2k -0.5k + M=0
M= -18.5 k/ft

answer claims to be 21k/ft

M N-N = -2k (3) + 0.5k (3) - 2k +0.5k +M=0
M= - 6 k/ft

answer claims to be + 6k/ft

Thank You
-Mike
 

Attachments

  • Untitled-1.jpg
    Untitled-1.jpg
    16.1 KB · Views: 520
Physics news on Phys.org
Your FBD's need some work in identifying force directions.
You have labeled the sections MM and NN , but then reverse them in your calcs.
I don't know what you mean about Ay = 10 K by inspection.
You should indicate that the base at A is a fixed connection.
The unit of moments or torques is ft*kips, not kips/ft.
For equilibrium, the sum of forces in the x direction, and the sum of forces in the y direction, and the sum of moments about any point, inetrnally or externally, are each equal to zero.

You are not calculating moments correctly. The moment of a force is the magnitude of the force times the perpendicular distance from its line of action to the point about which you are taking moments. If clockwise moments are considered plus, then counterclockwise moments are negative.
If you look at section MM (which you call NN in error), the 2 k force produces a cw moment about MM of (2)(3) = 6 ft-k. That means that the momnet at MM must be - 6 ft-k (CCW) in order for the moments to sum to 0 for equilibrium. The 0.5 K force produces no moment about MM, because there is no 'perpendicular distance' moment arm. And don't add up forces in ths equation...which you did...when you are summing moments. Move on to the next section 'NN'...
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top