Interpreting Data to Satisfy Conservation of Mass

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on interpreting data related to the conservation of mass in a system involving acetone and chloroform. It clarifies that the mole fraction of acetone can increase in both liquid and vapor phases as temperature rises, despite initial assumptions that it should decrease in one phase if it increases in another. The calculations provided illustrate how the mole fractions in both phases can change without violating conservation principles, as the total number of moles remains constant. The concept of constant relative volatility is introduced, explaining how it affects the relationship between mole fractions in the liquid and vapor phases. Overall, the analysis emphasizes that mole fractions are not inherently conserved quantities across different phases as temperature varies.
swmmr1928
Messages
55
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



This is not homework. I am having trouble interpreting this data. I don't see how it satisfies a conservation of mass. As the temperature is increasing, how is acetone increasing its mole fraction in both phases? If the mole fraction of acetone increases in one phase, then shouldn't it decrease in the other phase? Mole fraction is a conserved quantity right?

Homework Equations



267l1.png

Perry Handbook

The Attempt at a Solution



see [1]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi swmmr1928. I'm fairly sure "mole fraction of A in liquid phase" means the ratio nAl/(nAl+nCl) where n refers to number of moles and the superscript "l" refers to liquid phase. "A" is for acetone and "C" is for chloroform.

Likewise, "mole fraction of A in vapor state" meansn nAv/(nAv+nCv) where "v" refers to vapor state.

With this definition, you can see that the sum of the mole fractions of A in liquid and vapor phases does not need to remain constant as temperature changes.

Here's a little exercise. (Numbers are totally made up!) Consider a system of 10 moles of A and 10 moles of C initially with both substances entirely liquid. Slowly raise the temperature until some of the liquid begins to vaporize. Suppose at temperature T1 we find

nAl = 9.9 moles nAv = 0.1 moles (Note total is still 10 moles)
nCl = 9.98 moles nCv = 0.02 moles

Note that the vapor is richer in acetone because acetone is more volatile than chloroform.

Now we raise the temperature to T2 and find

nAl = 6.0 moles nAv = 4.0 moles
nCl = 8.5 moles nCv = 1.5 moles

Calculate the mole fractions of A in the liquid and vapor phases for these two temperature. Do you find that the mole fractions of A in both phases decrease with increase in temperature?
 
An easy way to get a feel for this is to consider two liquids that form an ideal solution when mixed, and whose vapors form an ideal gas solution in the gas phase. Your two substances do not quite do this, but that won't detract from the analysis for the ideal case.

Let xa and xb represent the mole fractions of the two species in the liquid phase, and let ya and yB represent the mole fractions of the two species in the gas phase. Let P represent the total pressure, which in your situation is a constant. Let pa (T) be the equilibrium vapor pressure of pure a at temperature T, and pb (T) be the equilibrium vapor pressure of pure b at temperature T. Then for the ideal situation above,

P ya = pa xa
P yb = pb xb

If you add these two equations together, you get:

P = pa xa + pb (1 - xa)

Solving for xa, you then get:

xa= (P - pb) / (pa - pb)

For a given temperature, this equation gives the mole fraction of a in the liquid phase. The mole fraction of a in the gas phase is then given by:

ya = pa xa / P

In many cases, the ratio of the equilibrium vapor pressures pa / pb is fairly insensitive to temperature (i.e., assuming nearly matching heats of vaporization of the pure substances). This is called the assumption of constant "relative volatility." If we make this approximation, and apply it to the first two equations, we obtain:

ya/(1 - ya) = xa/ (1 - xa)(pa / pb)

According to this equation, ya would increase monotonically with xa under the constant relative volatility approximation.
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top