Interpreting Distance-vs-Time and Accel-vs-Time Graphs

  • Thread starter Thread starter rejz55
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Analysis
AI Thread Summary
To interpret distance-vs-time and acceleration-vs-time graphs, the area under the velocity curve represents distance, calculated using the integral of velocity over time. The acceleration is determined by the slope of the velocity curve, with undefined acceleration points indicating instantaneous changes, such as collisions. Initially, a negative velocity indicates movement in one direction, while a subsequent positive velocity indicates a rapid change in direction. As the velocity decreases linearly, the acceleration remains constant, allowing for straightforward calculations of distance using triangular area formulas. Summing the distances with appropriate signs provides the total distance traveled, while analyzing each segment's slope yields the corresponding accelerations.
rejz55
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
View attachment Doc1.doc

how am i going to interpret the distance-vs-time and the acceleration-vs-time of this graph?
Thanks!
(the y-axis is the velocity and the x is the time- attached file)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The dist will be the usual area under the curve, with proper signs.

The accn is the slope of the curve, all constants in this case, with a few points where the accn is undefined.
 
Shooting star said:
The dist will be the usual area under the curve, with proper signs.

The accn is the slope of the curve, all constants in this case, with a few points where the accn is undefined.

Can you elaborate your explanation pls..Thanks..I have my few interpretations here..I just do no Know if they are right..Thanks..(see the attached file)
 

Attachments

In a speed vs. time graph, the area under the curve gives you the distance, since the distance is integral vdt. I hope you know this. The accn is dv/dt, and so the slope of the tangent at a point represents the accn.

Look at the start: the v is -5 m/s for some time t1 (not specified). So, the particle is moving left (say), and the dist covered will be the product of -5*t1 (in metres). It’s negative.

Next, at a single instant, the speed becomes +5 from -5, showing that accn is infinitely large and not defined at that instant. Typically, this represents an impulsive force acting for a very short time (what we call collisions).

Then the speed decreases linearly from 5 to 0, and the accn is uniform because the slope of the graph is constant. The accn a= (0-5)/t2 m/s/s. The dist is the area of the triangle, giving the formula d= ½ v0*t2.

Then the speed is zero => dist covered is 0 and accn =0.

You get the drift, I hope. At the end, you can sum up all the distances, with proper signs, to find the total dist travelled. Find the accns for each of the segments by finding the slope.
 
Thanks shooting star..:smile:
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top