Interpreting the Wave-Number in the Formula for Group Velocity

AI Thread Summary
The group velocity of a wave packet is defined by the formula v_g = dω/dk, where the wave number k influences the velocity. The discussion highlights the complexity of interpreting this relationship, particularly when ω and k are not linearly related, leading to varying slopes in the group velocity. It is noted that while different points in the wave packet travel at different velocities, the wave number is typically associated with the entire packet rather than individual segments. Suggestions for determining the wave number include using the average wavelength or analyzing the frequency spectrum of the wave packet. The conversation emphasizes the challenges posed by dispersion, which causes the wave packet to lose its shape and complicates the selection of an appropriate wave number.
ShayanJ
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Messages
2,801
Reaction score
606
You people know that group velocity of a wave packet is calculated with the formula v_g=\frac{d \omega}{d k}.But this gives an expression which,in general,is a function of k.My problem is,I can't think of an interpretation for it.What is that wave-number appearing in the expression for group velocity?
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm not sure what is confusing about this. As long as ω and k are not related linearly, the slope dω/dk will change with ω or k.
 
I know that different points of the wave packet move with different velocities,but I want to know how can I find the wave number associated to each point of the wave packet.
 
The wave number is associated with the entire packet, not with different parts of the packet.

A couple of ways to get the wave number are:

1. Use the wavelength, or perhaps the average wavelength, for the oscillations within the wave packet.

2. Look at the frequency spectrum of the wave packet, and use the peak or average frequency in that spectrum to determine the wave number.
 
I can't accept what you say!
In the presence of dispersion,any wave packet,in general,will lose shape which means different parts of it move with different velocities.
Also computing group velocity with a wave number which can be chosen between some alternatives seems a little arbitrary!
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
686
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
45
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top