Intersection of straight line with (lagrange) polynomial

bigfooted
Gold Member
Messages
685
Reaction score
222
Hi,

To calculate the intersection of two straight lines the cross product of the line vectors can be used, i.e. when the lines start in points p and q, and have direction vectors r and s, then if the cross product r x s is nonzero, the intersection point is q+us, and can be found from
p+t\cdot r = q+u\cdot s.
using
t=\frac{(q-p)\times s}{r \times s}


I was wondering how to derive such a relationship for the intersection between a straight line and a second order polynomial.

Specifically, I'm interested in second order Lagrange (and 3rd order Hermite) polynomials:

x=\Psi_1x_1+\Psi_2x_2+\Psi_3x_3,

with

\Psi_i=\prod_{M=1,M ≠ N}^{n}\frac{\xi-\xi_M}{\xi_N-\xi_M}

where \xi=0..1 and x_1 is the starting point, x_2 the midpoint and x_3 the endpoint

My guess is that standard techniques to find the intersection first transform the second order polynomial to the unit plane where the polynomial reduces to a line, then find the intersection and then transform back, but a (quick) search didn't give me anything.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
The usual procedure would be to parameterize both of them and look for the intersections. I can't see how the normals would help here.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top