Intro to Quantum Mechanics - Formalism normalisation

Graham87
Messages
72
Reaction score
16
Homework Statement
See pic
Relevant Equations
See pic
I can't figure out how they get i/sqrt(2) for normalisation of c1. Why is it a complex number? If I normalise c1 I just get 1/sqrt(2) because i disappears in the absolute value squared.

Thanks

1.png
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It looks like you left out other information from the problem, but apparently, there was the relation ##c_1 = i c_0##. That's where the ##i## comes from. Note that you had to have this relationship to solve for ##c_0##
otherwise you'd have two unknowns but only one equation.
 
  • Like
Likes topsquark and Graham87
vela said:
It looks like you left out other information from the problem, but apparently, there was the relation ##c_1 = i c_0##. That's where the ##i## comes from. Note that you had to have this relationship to solve for ##c_0##
otherwise you'd have two unknowns but only one equation.

There was this relation:

1.png


Aha, so the exponential is also interpreted as i then. Thanks, got it!
 
##e^{i\pi/2}= \cos (\pi/2) + i \sin(\pi/2) = i##
##e^{iv}= \cos (v) + i \sin(v) ##
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS, topsquark and Graham87
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...

Similar threads

Back
Top