How many strange quarks are in a ∑+ particle?

AI Thread Summary
The ∑+ particle is a baryon composed of three quarks: two up quarks and one strange quark. It has a strangeness value of -1, which is attributed to the presence of the strange quark. The discussion highlights the confusion around determining the number of strange quarks in the particle. Ultimately, it is clarified that the ∑+ particle contains one strange quark. Understanding the quark composition is essential for grasping the properties of baryons like the ∑+.
Tomo-
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


The ∑+ particle is a baryon with strangeness -1.

How many quarks does the ∑+ particle contain?

Homework Equations



How many of the quarks are strange?

The Attempt at a Solution


I know it contains 3 quarks, 2 ups and 1 strange quark but I'm not sure how to work this out, for future reference, I'm just a little confused.

Edit: just realized this is probably in the wrong section - apologies.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
A strange quark has a strangeness of -1. You know there are 3 quarks in a baryon and its strangeness is given as -1 so the answer from there should be obvious.
 
Kindly see the attached pdf. My attempt to solve it, is in it. I'm wondering if my solution is right. My idea is this: At any point of time, the ball may be assumed to be at an incline which is at an angle of θ(kindly see both the pics in the pdf file). The value of θ will continuously change and so will the value of friction. I'm not able to figure out, why my solution is wrong, if it is wrong .
TL;DR Summary: I came across this question from a Sri Lankan A-level textbook. Question - An ice cube with a length of 10 cm is immersed in water at 0 °C. An observer observes the ice cube from the water, and it seems to be 7.75 cm long. If the refractive index of water is 4/3, find the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. I could not understand how the apparent height of the ice cube in the water depends on the height of the ice cube immersed in the water. Does anyone have an...
Back
Top