I've seen numerous rigourous/conceptual explanations of the difference between convergence in probability (weak), and strong, almost sure convergence.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

One explanation my prof gave was that convergence in probability entails:

[tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \mathbb{P}\left\{|X_{n}-X|<\epsilon\right\}=1[/tex]

or:

[tex]\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} \mathbb{P}\left\{\omega:|X_{n}(\omega)-X(\omega)|>\epsilon\right\}=0[/tex]

While strong convergence means:

[tex]\mathbb{P}\left\{\lim_{n \rightarrow \infty} X_{n}=X\right\}=1[/tex]

So my prof explains one difference is the limit is taken outside the probability for convergence in probability, while it is inside the probability for almost sure convergence.

Can anyone elaborate on this?

Also, the limits in both forms of convergence seem to imply the same thing.

How is it that saying the probability that [itex]|X_{n}-X|[/itex] is greater than some epsilon, goes to 0 for large n, implies that difference can jump above epsilon, infinitely many times?

And if it does, how is it that saying the probability of it staying below epsilon goes to 1, as n goes to infinity, implies that it CAN'T jump above epsilon EVER, after some n? (And is thus a somehow stronger form of convergence).

Thanks!

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# Intuitive Difference Between Weak And Strong Convergence in Probability

Loading...

Similar Threads - Intuitive Difference Between | Date |
---|---|

B Least / Smallest / Minimum Detectable Difference | Jan 21, 2018 |

A Improving intuition on applying likelihood ratio test | Dec 12, 2016 |

Intuitive explanation of lim sup of sequence of sets | Feb 22, 2016 |

Naive (intuitive) definition of set | Oct 5, 2013 |

Intuitive explanations for Gaussian distribution function and mahalanobis distance | Dec 18, 2012 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**