Invent a suitable rational function with characteristics

  • Thread starter Thread starter Glissando
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Rational
Glissando
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


For each part, invent a suitable rational function, f(x), with the characteristics given and make a sketch of your function.

a) y behaves like x/3 for large x and x=1 is a vertical asymptote

b) x=2 and x=4 are vertical asymptotes, f(-1) = 0, f(3) = 0, and f(0) = 1

Homework Equations


Zeroes, limits, infinity


The Attempt at a Solution



For part a, I've struggled to understand the question. I understand that there must be a y=x/3. I don't get the "large x"...if there's supposed to be a second x? and if x=1 is a vertical asymptote then you set the denominator equal to 0 and x is supposed to equal 1.

For part 2, I somehow need to figure out a denominator that allows x= 2 and 4.

I honestly have no idea how to start inventing a rational function ): Any help would be appreciated.

Thanks in advance!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi Glissando! :smile:

Part (a) just means that you have y=x/3 as skew asymptote.
What must hold for a function to have y=x/3 as a skew asymptote?

What must hold in order for f to have an asymptote at x=1? Can you find such a function? (ignore the rest of the conditions for now...)
 
Hey Micro,

Thank you for your quick response (:

For x=1, then y = 0. I just made up 0 = x-1.

For y = x/3, y must equal 0 so x equals 0...(?) I'm not too sure about skewed asymptotes and the rules it follows ):

EDIT

Hey,

Thanks (; I got the first one to f(x) = x^2/(3(x-1))

I figured that for part b, f(x)= something/ (2-x)(4-x) but when I try to put something with x on top, everything works out except for f(0) = 1 ):
 
Last edited:
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
40
Views
4K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
2K
Back
Top