Inverse Square Law - Calculating the solid angle

CodyW
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi Everyone,

For an individual inquiry and formal lab report task at school I have chosen to conduct an experiment to find out whether hot shoe mounted flash units follow the inverse square law and how the flash zoom is affected by the inverse square law.

My first question is that In order for me to find the solid angle I have to I have to find the area at a specific distance. Is there an easier way to go about calculating the solid angle other than using surface integrals?

My second question is that is there a way to calculate the luminous intensity from the power output of the flash (in watt seconds)?

Any help would be greatly appreciated. :)

Kind Regards,
Cody
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Is there an easier way to go about calculating the solid angle other than using surface integrals?
Depends on the data you have. The area at a specific distance is sufficient to calculate the solid angle without integrals.
My second question is that is there a way to calculate the luminous intensity from the power output of the flash (in watt seconds)?
If you know the spectrum (and the efficiency, if the power is the input of your flash light).
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top