Investigating a Rolling Ball-Bearing

  • Thread starter Thread starter Magg$
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Rolling
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on analyzing the motion of a ball-bearing rolling down a ramp of 120cm length, with a mass of 0.02815kg and a diameter of 19mm. Key calculations suggested include determining potential energy at various heights using PE = mgh, calculating velocity with v = d/t, and assessing kinetic energy with KE = 1/2mv^2. Additionally, plotting ramp height against travel time can reveal patterns, while acceleration can be calculated using a = (vf - vi)/t. These analyses will enhance understanding of the relationship between ramp height and the ball's travel time.
Magg$
Messages
19
Reaction score
0
Hi, I am doing some analysis into a ball rolling down a ramp which is raised and lowered to different heights, and the time the ball takes to travel the length of the ramp is recorded. The ramp is 120cm long, and the ball has a mass of 0.02815kg and diameter of 19mm.

I am trying to find some calculations, and poins which I can make about this set up, but so far have only very basic calculations.

If you know of anything I can talk about, or calculate, then any suggestions are greatly appreciated.

Thankyou...

Magg$
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It shouldn't be too hard to predict the time it will take for the ball to roll down the ramp for a given angle.

For a first pass model, assume that the ball bearing has uniform density and that the ball rolls without slip down the ramp.

Find the net torque to find the (constant) acceleration down the ramp. Keep in mind that a = Rα (that could be negative depending on your sign convention; just stay consistent). With the acceleration known, the time calculation should be easy. Please post your work if you have any trouble with this so we can help some more.
 


Hi Magg$,

Thank you for sharing your investigation on a rolling ball-bearing. It sounds like an interesting experiment! Based on the information you provided, I can suggest a few calculations and points you can make about this set up.

1. Calculate the potential energy of the ball at different heights on the ramp. This can be done using the formula PE = mgh, where m is the mass of the ball, g is the acceleration due to gravity (9.8 m/s^2), and h is the height of the ramp. This will give you an idea of how the potential energy changes as the height of the ramp is raised or lowered.

2. Use the formula v = d/t to calculate the velocity of the ball at different points on the ramp. Here, v represents velocity, d is the distance (120cm in this case), and t is the time taken for the ball to travel the distance. This will give you an idea of how the velocity changes as the height of the ramp is changed.

3. Calculate the kinetic energy of the ball at different points on the ramp. This can be done using the formula KE = 1/2mv^2, where m is the mass of the ball and v is the velocity calculated in the previous step. This will give you an understanding of how the kinetic energy of the ball changes as it rolls down the ramp.

4. Plot a graph of the ramp height vs. the time taken for the ball to travel the distance. This will help you visualize the relationship between the two variables and see if there is a pattern or trend.

5. You can also calculate the acceleration of the ball using the formula a = (vf - vi)/t, where vf is the final velocity, vi is the initial velocity (which is 0 since the ball starts from rest), and t is the time taken for the ball to travel the distance. This will give you an idea of how the acceleration changes as the height of the ramp is changed.

Overall, these calculations and points will help you analyze the motion of the ball on the ramp and make conclusions about the relationship between the ramp height and the time taken for the ball to travel the distance. I hope this helps and good luck with your investigation!
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top