Investigating How Water Volume Affects Ice Melting Rate

AI Thread Summary
The experiment aimed to investigate how water volume affects ice melting rates by measuring the amount of ice melted and the final water temperature across different water volumes. Results indicated that as water volume increased, the volume of ice melted also increased, while the change in temperature decreased. The discussion highlighted the importance of repeating the experiment for accuracy and suggested graphing the results to identify trends. Concerns were raised about potential errors in the data table, prompting a request for clarification. Overall, the findings suggest a relationship between water volume and ice melting, but further analysis is needed to understand the underlying reasons.
dumb__x
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Aim: How does the volume of water at a given temperature affect the amount of ice that can melt in it?

I did a lab experiment. I put ice in different volumes of water and waited for 5minutes. I measured the amount of ice melted and the final temperature of water.

RESULT: (starting temp=18℃
Volume of water in cup/ Volume of ice melted / Final temperature of water
100ml / 12ml / 11℃
200ml / 20ml / 12℃
300ml / 25ml / 16℃
400ml / 20ml / 16℃

This shows that as the volume of water increases at a given temperature, the volume of ice melted icreases. It also shows that the change in temperature decreases.

I do not understand why. and I can't explain. Please HELP!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Did you do any repeats in this experiment, or did you only do it once for each volume? I am saying this because if your results show a trend that does not agree with any theory then it will be difficult to find information supporting it. If you did three repeats for each volume then atleast you can say there was probably a higher degree of accuracy in your results when averaged.
 
Thanks for the reply. Yes. The results were almost the same.
 
You could draw a graph for both volume of water melted and volume of water. And another one for change in temperature and voume of water. Once you have drawn the graphs then you can comment on trends that the graphs shows and then dra a conclusion from them. I myself am not sure what the trend should be, but this is the way I would approach the problem. :smile:
 
Are you sure there isn't a typo in the table of your results?
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top