A Investigations into a heuristic Lagrangian of graviton field

spaghetti3451
Messages
1,311
Reaction score
31
The following is taken from page 40 of Matthew Schwartz's "Introduction to Quantum Field Theory."

The Lagrangian for the graviton is heuristically ##\mathcal{L}=-\frac{1}{2}h\Box h + \frac{1}{3}\lambda h^{3}+Jh,## where ##h## represents the gravitational potential. We are ignoring spin and treating gravity as a simple scalar field theory. The ##h^3## term represents a graviton self-interaction, which is present in general relativity and so ##\lambda \sim \sqrt{G_N}##. The equations of motion are ##\Box h -\lambda h^{2}-J=0##.

Why the ##h^{3}## term represent the graviton self-interaction? What does self-interaction mean anyway? Does it mean the interaction among the various excitations of the graviton field?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, draw the Feynmandiagrams for this theory, and you see that the h^3 term brings together three gravitons. As such it describes an interaction among gravitons themselves, hence "self-interaction". So to answer your last question: yes. You can compare it with a simple phi to the fourth theory :)
 
Thanks!

I was also wondering why the fact that the ##h^3## term is present in general relativity implies that ##\lambda \sim \sqrt{G_N}##?

Where in general relativity is the ##h^3## term present anyway?
 
bummp!
 
failexam said:
Thanks!

I was also wondering why the fact that the ##h^3## term is present in general relativity implies that ##\lambda \sim \sqrt{G_N}##?

Where in general relativity is the ##h^3## term present anyway?
In GR you have an expansion which gives you an infinite number of self-interactions in the Lagrangian; this is just a matter of expanding the Lagrangian around a vacuum (e.g. Minkowski). A quadratic term is a mass-term, and since the graviton is massless in GR this term is absent. The (mass) dimension of lambda can be derived from considering the (mass) dimension of the Lagrangian or action. This is a nice exercise for you to do; if you want help, consult e.g. Zee's QFT book.
 
Thread 'Can this experiment break Lorentz symmetry?'
1. The Big Idea: According to Einstein’s relativity, all motion is relative. You can’t tell if you’re moving at a constant velocity without looking outside. But what if there is a universal “rest frame” (like the old idea of the “ether”)? This experiment tries to find out by looking for tiny, directional differences in how objects move inside a sealed box. 2. How It Works: The Two-Stage Process Imagine a perfectly isolated spacecraft (our lab) moving through space at some unknown speed V...
Does the speed of light change in a gravitational field depending on whether the direction of travel is parallel to the field, or perpendicular to the field? And is it the same in both directions at each orientation? This question could be answered experimentally to some degree of accuracy. Experiment design: Place two identical clocks A and B on the circumference of a wheel at opposite ends of the diameter of length L. The wheel is positioned upright, i.e., perpendicular to the ground...
According to the General Theory of Relativity, time does not pass on a black hole, which means that processes they don't work either. As the object becomes heavier, the speed of matter falling on it for an observer on Earth will first increase, and then slow down, due to the effect of time dilation. And then it will stop altogether. As a result, we will not get a black hole, since the critical mass will not be reached. Although the object will continue to attract matter, it will not be a...
Back
Top