Ion Distribution in Grounded Metal Bowl: NaCl in Water

patm95
Messages
30
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Imagine water in a metal bowl that is open to air. This metal bowl is grounded. You add some NaCl to the water. What would the distributions of the ions look like in the water.

Homework Equations



I think this doesn't need equations, but just general understanding of how ions interact with each other and conductors.

The Attempt at a Solution



My thought process is this. If the NaCl ions could combine in water, then they wouldn't dissolve. So we have these ions floating around which increase the conductivity of the water. Because the metal itself is grounded and also a good conductor we get somewhat of a image effect in which the ions will tend to collect towards the metal bowl. Is this a good understanding of the problem?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sounds somewhat close. You are definitely right on the reason NaCl dissolves. NaCl dissolves in water to form aqueous Na+ and Cl- ions.

Now on the next part I'm not so sure. Why would any image effect be produced? Realistically you have equal numbers of positive and negative charges randomly floating around. Any effects produced by a positive ion will be canceled by the effects of a nearby negative ion. Although the bowl is grounded, you would still need to add an electrode to the solution in order to induce any structural form of ions.

This is my opinion though... take it with a grain of salt ;)
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top