Ionisation levels in hydrogen and helium

jools holland
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



a) Explain qualitatively why the energy required to remove one electron from the ground state of the helium atom is much larger than that in hydrogen, while for other states the hydrogenic value is quite a good approximation, e.g. the 1s2s levels in helium have energies very similar to the 2s energy in hydrogen.

b) The 1s2s configuration in helium is split into two levels. Explain briefly the physical origin of the splitting, and how it comes about that these different energies should be associated with different relative orientations of the intrinsic spins of the two electrons (so that one of the levels is called a “singlet”, and the other a “triplet”).

Homework Equations



none

The Attempt at a Solution



a) The ground state of helium has direct exposure to a greater charged nucleus than hydrogen so the ionisation energy is greater. The other levels of helium are shielded by previous levels' electrons.

b) no idea.

[/B]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
a) I agree with you.

b) "Singlet" and "triplet", these are your keywords. Splitting occurs because there is the total wavefunction must obey Pauli principle, i.e. it must be antisymmetric.
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top