IR divergences by analytic continuation of parameters

zetafunction
Messages
371
Reaction score
0
i had a discussion with a physicist i proposed that in order to avoid the IR divergence

\int_{0}^{\infty}dx(x-a)^{-3}x^{2}

we could propose as regularized value the value of F(-a) , where F is the integral

\int_{0}^{\infty}dx(x+b)^{-3}x^{2} so if we could regularize this simply setting b=-a the IR divergence dissapear

is this method valid , to analytic continua with respect to some parameters into the real or complex plane.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
zetafunction said:
i had a discussion with a physicist i proposed that in order to avoid the IR divergence

\int_{0}^{\infty}dx(x-a)^{-3}x^{2}

we could propose as regularized value the value of F(-a) , where F is the integral

\int_{0}^{\infty}dx(x+b)^{-3}x^{2} so if we could regularize this simply setting b=-a the IR divergence dissapear

is this method valid , to analytic continua with respect to some parameters into the real or complex plane.

it is valid whenever you know (or can safely assume) that the quantity you want to compute is analytic along a path from a to -b.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top