Irrotational Flow: Understanding the Physical Implications of Curl(U)=0

  • Thread starter Thread starter Baggio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Flow
AI Thread Summary
Irrotational flow, characterized by curl(U)=0, indicates that the velocity vector field is conservative and originates from a scalar potential, meaning fluid lines remain parallel without curling. This condition implies that individual fluid elements do not rotate, leading to a flow that is smooth and predictable. While some may confuse irrotational flow with laminar flow, they are distinct concepts; laminar flow can occur in scenarios that are not irrotational. The discussion highlights the significance of understanding these terms in fluid dynamics. Overall, the physical implications of irrotational flow are crucial for comprehending fluid behavior in various contexts.
Baggio
Messages
211
Reaction score
1
All the math based texts just simply derive or state curl(U)=0 but what does this physically mean?

Does it mean that a single fluid element does not rotate?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It means that the velocity vector field is a conservative one,as it comes from a scalar potential (due to curl=0).Yes,the condition is called "irrotational flow" for good reason;basically the fluid lines do not curl,they are parallel wrt themselves at any moment of time.
http://discover.edventures.com/functions/termlib.php?action=&termid=532&alpha=r&searchString=

Daniel.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
I suspect a good intro to superfluidity will cover this nicely ... let me check if I've got something bookmarked.
 
I would suspect an equivalent term for it would be:"laminar flow".

But that's just terminology.The basic idea behind is relevant.

Daniel.

EDIT:It would be really dull,if i wasn't wrong from time to time,huh...? :-p
 
Last edited:
There is no connection between the concepts "laminar flow" and "irrotational flow".
Couette flow is certainly laminar, but not at all irrotational.
Irrotational means what it says: the local angular velocity at a point is zero.

EDIT: Yes, I think I would yawn myself to death if you were right all the time..:wink:
(Possibly, that's what I ought to do, anyways?? :confused:)
 
Last edited:
I thought so, thanks.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top