So, why are you arguing with an idiot? Such arguments never have any end. He's already made up his mind and I doubt anything you can say will change it. Evolution will NEVER be a "law". Words, words, words.Solitos said:So...was I wrong? Some context: this guy does not accept the theory of evolution because it is not a law yet (in his words).
A biological principle is a fundamental concept or theory that explains a phenomenon in biology, while a scientific law is a well-supported and widely accepted statement that describes a natural phenomenon. In other words, a biological principle is a concept, and a scientific law is a fact.
Yes, a biological principle can become a scientific law if it is repeatedly observed and tested, and there is overwhelming evidence to support it.
Biological principles are determined through observation, experimentation, and analysis of data. Scientific laws are determined through the scientific method, which involves formulating a hypothesis, conducting experiments, and analyzing the results.
No, not all biological principles are considered scientific laws. Some principles may be widely accepted and supported by evidence, but they may not have reached the level of a scientific law.
Yes, there can be exceptions to both biological principles and scientific laws. As our understanding of biology and the natural world continues to evolve, new evidence may arise that challenges previously accepted principles and laws. Additionally, there may be rare or unique cases that do not follow the expected patterns described by principles and laws.