Is a(x,y,z) = (2ax,2ay,2az) a Vector Space?

stunner5000pt
Messages
1,443
Reaction score
4
decide whether this is a vector space or not
a(x,y,z) = (2ax,2ay,2az)

all the addition axoims hold easily
for the scalar multiplications axioms
for some real scaral a
a(x,y,z) = (ax,ay,az) \in 2(ax,ay,az)
a(x_{1}+x_{2},y_{1}+y_{2},z_{1}+z_{2}) = a(x_{1},y_{1},a(z_{1}) + a(x_{2},y_{2},a(z_{2}) \in (2ax,2ay,2az) this doesn't seem to hold because it would only be possible if the wo vecotrs being added were not distinct.

(a+b)(x,y,z) = (ax+bx,ay+by,az+bz) \in (2az,2ay,2az)

a(bx,by,bz) = (ab)(x,y,z) this would seem t ohold if b was 2... not not anytrhing else? Not sure here?

multiplcation by 1 gives us what we want. so the last axiom holds
i can post hte axioms if u want

my text says it is not a vector space because of the failure of scalara multiplication where i have stated the doubts mysefl. Are those hte valid reasons for that??
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
stunner5000pt said:
decide whether this is a vector space or not
a(x,y,z) = (2ax,2ay,2az)


what the hell are x,y,z, or a?
 
stunner5000pt said:
decide whether this is a vector space or not
a(x,y,z) = (2ax,2ay,2az)

all the addition axoims hold easily
for the scalar multiplications axioms
for some real scaral a
a(x,y,z) = (ax,ay,az) \in 2(ax,ay,az)
a(x_{1}+x_{2},y_{1}+y_{2},z_{1}+z_{2}) = a(x_{1},y_{1},a(z_{1}) + a(x_{2},y_{2},a(z_{2}) \in (2ax,2ay,2az) this doesn't seem to hold because it would only be possible if the wo vecotrs being added were not distinct.

(a+b)(x,y,z) = (ax+bx,ay+by,az+bz) \in (2az,2ay,2az)

a(bx,by,bz) = (ab)(x,y,z) this would seem t ohold if b was 2... not not anytrhing else? Not sure here?

multiplcation by 1 gives us what we want. so the last axiom holds
i can post hte axioms if u want

my text says it is not a vector space because of the failure of scalara multiplication where i have stated the doubts mysefl. Are those hte valid reasons for that??
a(x,y,z)= (2ax,2ay,2az) doesn't make sense. Are you asked to show that the set of all (x,y,z) with ordinary addition but scalar multiplication defined by a(x,y,z)= (2a,2ay,2az) is a vector space?
 
HallsofIvy said:
a(x,y,z)= (2ax,2ay,2az) doesn't make sense. Are you asked to show that the set of all (x,y,z) with ordinary addition but scalar multiplication defined by a(x,y,z)= (2a,2ay,2az) is a vector space?

that is what i am asked to prove
 
Multiplication by must send v to v, ie 1.v=v for all v in the space.
 
stunner5000pt said:
that is what i am asked to prove

I don't believe for a moment that your problem says exactly
"decide whether this is a vector space or not a(x,y,z) = (2ax,2ay,2az)"
There isn't even a set that could be a vector space there!
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top