Courses Is availability of astrophysics/astronomy courses important for an undergrad?

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the concerns of a high school senior interested in astrophysics but considering small liberal arts colleges that lack dedicated astronomy or astrophysics majors. Key points include the viability of majoring in physics at these institutions, as the coursework may not significantly differ from that at schools with specialized programs. Additionally, there is reassurance that students from liberal arts colleges have successfully pursued graduate studies in astrophysics, provided they have a solid physics foundation and access to faculty involved in astronomy research. The consensus suggests that while a dedicated astronomy major can be beneficial, it is not essential for graduate school admissions in astrophysics. The importance of a strong physics background is emphasized, along with the potential for valuable experiences and opportunities at liberal arts colleges.
wynton
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
My son, a high school senior, is on the verge of applying to college. The potential problem we are encountering is that he thinks he'll want to study astrophysics, but his top college choices are mostly small, liberal arts schools that offer neither astronomy or astrophysics as a major. And some appear to offer just 1-2 astronomy classes (though I suspect that they all offer at least that).

The question we have is whether this really matters.

I guess this question really addresses two things:

First, if he attends a small college and majors in physics, will his actual course-work differ much from the experience of attending a school that offers a major in astronomy or astrophysics?

Second, will he be at any disadvantage when it comes to applying to graduate school if he has taken very few astronomy or astrophysics classes?

I suppose I'll also mention some schools he's currently considering, just in case anyone has any first-hand knowledge of their physics departments:

Clark University (his first choice at the moment, but for the lack of a major in astrophysics)
Washington University in St. Louis
University of Rochester
Muhlenberg
Dickinson
Skidmore
University of Wisconsin
Franklin and Marshall
Oberlin
Kenyon
Denison
University of Indiana
Miami at Ohio

Thanks for any thoughts.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I have personal experience with several of the liberal arts colleges on your list. I know several people who have graduated from there, gone on to good grad programs in astronomy and physics, and who are now working in astronomy as a result. Those are all great choices. I attended a small liberal arts college myself (not one your son could attend), and did just fine in astronomy. Heck, a recent Nobel Prize winner in (astro)physics (John Mather) graduated from Swarthmore, another small liberal arts college. As long as they have a decent-sized physics department and hopefully employ at least one person doing some kind of astronomy research, he'll be fine. They don't need a separate astronomy program, and your son needs to major in physics anyway. Astronomy as a major as well would be nice, but it's not required, and not always offered. He needs a strong physics background to get into grad school for astrophysics.
 
I asked a similar question recently. My situation is a little different (I'm a transfer student and my target school is disolving their Astronomy department), but I think some of the answers may offer a bit of insight. (The consensus seems to echo Eri's sentiment)

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?t=542805
 
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
Back
Top