Is Ball Bouncing on a Surface a Simple Harmonic Motion?

  • Thread starter Thread starter PhysicStud01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Ball Surface
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the ball bouncing on a surface exemplifies simple harmonic motion (SHM). Participants analyze the force-extension relationship, noting that the force is zero before and after contact, peaking during maximum deformation. The force increases as the ball deforms the surface and decreases as it returns to its original shape, suggesting a sinusoidal pattern characteristic of SHM. The conversation emphasizes that while the force curve can approximate straight lines, it should remain continuous without sharp corners. Overall, the elastic nature of the ball supports the conclusion that it behaves like SHM during the bounce.
PhysicStud01
Messages
174
Reaction score
0
Homework Statement
Why does the graph have this shape?
Relevant Equations
area under the graph gives the change in momentum
Untitled.png


Answer is C.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
PhysicStud01 said:
Answer is C.
..., and your question is...?
 
why is the shape of the force extension graph this way?

area gives change in momentum.
but the gradient does not represent any physical quantity?

why does the force increase at a decreasing rate, then decrease at an increasing rate?
 
Step at a time: what is happening?
 
the ball has an initial velocity down.
this is reduced to zero, then increase upwards.

but does the force change this way? is it not constant? and why with this gradient?
 
The force is zero just before contact is made, it is also zero immediately after contact is lost and is non-zero in between. Which of the 4 graphs best shows this?
 
  • Like
Likes Bystander
kuruman said:
The force is zero just before contact is made, it is also zero immediately after contact is lost and is non-zero in between. Which of the 4 graphs best shows this?
thanks, I had already understood this one.
but during the contact, why does the force behave this way?
 
PhysicStud01 said:
thanks, I had already understood this one.
but during the contact, why does the force behave this way?
How else can it behave if it is zero at the beginning and the end of the time interval? It has to reach a maximum in between. The idea is that the rubber ball and the table surface deform elastically while they are in contact. The force that one exerts on the other increases as the deformation increases, it is maximum at maximum deformation and decreases as the deformation decreases. Now if you are asking about the specific shape of the curve, that depends on the model used to describe the deformation, however all models will have the same general feature which distinguishes (c) from all the other answers.
 
kuruman said:
How else can it behave if it is zero at the beginning and the end of the time interval? It has to reach a maximum in between. The idea is that the rubber ball and the table surface deform elastically while they are in contact. The force that one exerts on the other increases as the deformation increases, it is maximum at maximum deformation and decreases as the deformation decreases. Now if you are asking about the specific shape of the curve, that depends on the model used to describe the deformation, however all models will have the same general feature which distinguishes (c) from all the other answers.
so, it could be straight lines too? as long as it starts from zero, reach a maximum, then decreases to zero again?
 
  • #10
It could be as an approximation. Nature almost always abhors sharp corners which means that the slope of the F vs. t curve should be continuous at all points.
 
  • #11
ok, thanks
 
  • #12
PhysicStud01 said:
so, it could be straight lines too? as long as it starts from zero, reach a maximum, then decreases to zero again?
The ball is elastic, so to a first approximation it should be SHM. That makes it the positive half of a sine wave.
 
Back
Top