Is building a particle accelerator legal ?

AI Thread Summary
Building a particle accelerator is generally legal, but operating one may involve regulatory restrictions, particularly concerning emissions and safety. Individuals have successfully constructed small accelerators and fusion reactors at home, indicating feasibility. In Canada, obtaining a permit from the equivalent of the FCC is necessary, especially when purchasing materials like liquid helium. While the construction itself may not break laws, careful attention to operational guidelines is essential. Understanding the relevant legal framework is crucial for anyone considering this project.
Monocerotis
Gold Member
Messages
54
Reaction score
0
So apparently Michio Kaku built a 2.3-million-electron-volt particle accelerator in his parents' garage; once Harvard University found out about this they granted him admission.

I'd like to go to Harvard.

So if I were to build a particle accelerator would I be breaking any laws, or is it all good in the hood ?

Note: I am Canadian.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
not knowing the exact intricacies of building a particle accelerator from scratch(I assume it involves this thing called money, which mean lots of queen Beth's) what I do know is that not many laws could be broken building it. Laws can be broken when operating it. small difference I know, but a big one. to my knowledge PA's mostly work by magnetics timed perfectly and built to high specifications. there is no real problem with this, just a FCC(Canadian equivalent) permit away. You will be put on the warning watch list when(if?) you buy a whole ton of liquid helium.

~socrunningman
 
That cathode-ray television you used to have or still have accelerated particles...you've always been using particle accelerators, so you could probably build one without legal trouble (but as socrunningman said, depending on what your materials are, you might run into some trouble buying them).
 
Not particularly. People in the US have built and operated fusion reactors in their own homes and even a particle accelerator can be small enough for tabletop (as the earliest ones were). I think that socrunningman is right, the operation of the device may be restricted in terms of the emissions. You may want to read up on the relevant laws from the equivalent of the FCC to make sure that you properly shield your device.
 
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'
Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
Back
Top