Is \( c_P \) Pressure Independent if \( \alpha = \frac{1}{T} \)?

fluidistic
Gold Member
Messages
3,928
Reaction score
272

Homework Statement


I'm stuck on a relatively simple exercise which can be found in Callen's book: Show that if ##\alpha = \frac{1}{T}## then ##c_P## is pressure independent.

Homework Equations


What they ask me to show is: If ##\frac{1}{v} \left ( \frac{\partial v }{\partial T} \right ) _P=\frac{1}{T} \Rightarrow \left ( \frac{\partial c_P }{\partial P} \right ) _T=0##.
Where the lower case v is the molar volume and for what will follow the lower case letters are molar quantities.

The Attempt at a Solution


##c_P=T \left ( \frac{\partial s }{\partial T} \right ) _P##. Since both alpha and the specific heat at constant pressure are given in terms of T and P, I will think about v and ##c_p## as functions of T and P.
So ##\left ( \frac{\partial c_P }{\partial P} \right ) _T=T \frac{\partial }{\partial P} \left [\left ( \frac{\partial s }{\partial T} \right ) _P \right ] _T=T \frac{\partial }{\partial T} \left [ \left ( \frac{\partial s }{\partial P} \right ) _T \right ] _P##. Now I use a Maxwell relation, namely that ##\left ( \frac{\partial s }{\partial P} \right ) _T=- \left ( \frac{\partial v }{\partial T} \right ) _P##.
So I get that ##\left ( \frac{\partial c_P }{\partial P} \right ) _T=-T\frac{\partial }{\partial T} \left [ \left ( \frac{\partial v }{\partial T} \right ) _P \right ] _P=-T \frac{\partial }{\partial T} \left [ \left ( \frac{v(T,P)}{T} \right ) \right ] _P##.
So if I can show that ##\frac{\partial }{\partial T} \left [ \left ( \frac{v(T,P)}{T} \right ) \right ] _P=0## then the job would be done. However I'm stuck here, I haven't been able to find a way to show that... Am I going the wrong way? Or simply missing a simple thing?

Edit: Nevermind, problem solved. lol, I was missing a simple thing. I had to perform the partial derivative and I indeed reach that it's worth 0 and hence the proof is completed.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
The equation for the enthalpy change expressed in terms of dT and dP is given by
dH=C_pdT+V(1-\alpha T)dP

The form of this equation is
dH=\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}dT+\frac{\partial H}{\partial P}dP

Therefore,

\frac{\partial H}{\partial T}=C_p
\frac{\partial H}{\partial P}=V(1-\alpha T)
So,\frac{\partial^2 H}{\partial T \partial P}=\frac{\partial C_p}{\partial P}=\frac{\partial (V(1-\alpha T))}{\partial T}
 
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top