Admissions Is Changing My PhD Program After One Month a Wise Career Move?

AI Thread Summary
Changing from a PhD program in material science and engineering to a master's in electrical engineering is seen as a strategic move to align career goals with personal interests in nanotechnology and microelectronics. The individual recognized that the focus of their current program did not match their aspirations for practical applications, prompting the decision to leave early rather than commit to a path that felt unfulfilling. Concerns about how to frame this transition in their statement of purpose for admissions committees are prevalent, with advice suggesting to emphasize commitment to finding the right fit and the importance of pursuing a degree that aligns with career opportunities in their home country. The discussion highlights that early changes in academic direction can be acceptable and may not significantly impact future admission chances if framed positively. Ultimately, the focus should be on demonstrating a clear vision for future goals and the rationale behind the switch.
Rudra K
Messages
4
Reaction score
0
I started my Ph.D program this year in material science and engineering at a reputed school in the US. After a month I realized that I am more interested in how electrical engineers approach nanotechnology/microelectronics. I liked the idea of applying science to optimize devices and make useful tools out of novel materials.

I realized that most of the work of MSE is focused on synthesizing, characterizing and observing and explaining phenomena in materials, and not really concerned about applications. I also realized that I am not really interested in pursuing a PhD now, and that will not harm my job prospects. However, a job in this field in my country requires an electrical engineering degree.

So I decided to drop out of my program (after 1 month in) since I saw no point in committing to an advisor, and it would be unethical to take funding if my intentions are to leave with a master's degree. I am currently applying to electrical engineering master's programs (self-funded), and I received support from my undergraduate LOR writers.

However, I am not sure how I should frame my situation to admission committees. It seems like no matter how I frame it, it looks bad. How would I frame this in my SOP? Did I ruin my admission chances? I have a good Undergraduate GPA (>3.8) and a year and a half of research experience.

I talked to my UG research advisor and he was not willing to write me a LOR since he believes I had a chance and I below it. I just don't see the point of doing something I am not happy about, let alone wasting others' time and resources. I know my situation is rare but I would really appreciate any advice.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I also wanted to add that a master's degree will allow me to narrow down my specific research interests if I decided to pursue a PhD in the future.
 
Last edited:
People change their minds, its perhaps poor timing but its very early in the cycle so I don't think it will impact you. I think you can do this once in your academic career without a heavy penalty.

It would have been much worse to switch midway or towards the end but again if you have a serious change of heart then that's what you should tell them. It's important to show that you have sticktoitiveness and that what you say is what you'll do.

Their concern will be about how committed you will be and given your history will you jump again or not.

I think since this is the first time then you are still okay.As an aside:

Sometimes in industry you'll be working at a job and decide you want something better and so apply to another company and get an offer but then your old boss says wait I can do better I'll give you a healthy raise...

The question is do you take your boss’s offer or do you jump?

Its a hard question to answer, but one thing is certain if you accept the boss’s raise and stay, you'll either do well and thrive or your next raise will be significantly delayed or smaller since you forced your old boss’s hand. The other thing is the tactic will likely fail if you do it again a year or two later.

In the case of the new job offer, you could politely decline it and try to keep it open for the next time you decide to leave. Basically, you have a delicate balancing act to keep your options open.
 
  • Like
Likes Rudra K
Just a comment on materials engineering - my father managed materials labs for IBM, and the work was all applications oriented. Questions might be related to using an existing material in new conditions and studying how it might respond, or coming up with a new material having properties required for some new device.
 
  • Like
Likes berkeman
I totally understand. There is lots of similarity between MSE and EE when it comes to nanotechnology/microelectronics and photonics. but it seems to me that EE is more focused on the application and optimization of devices rather than " here is a material it exhibits so and so, feel free to use it as you like". Another reason for switching to EE, is because MSE does not exist in any university in my country which could affect my employability.
 
Also beside the issues of interest fit, there is the issues of diploma recognition. Back in my country, a masters degree is required before PhD in order for the diploma to be recognized by the ministry of education. Also, MSE is not offered by almost all universities so employers back home are not familiar with the major.

I don't want to turn my SOP into "why I left" so what should I briefly mention to explain my change of field and program?
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
Yesterday, 9/5/2025, when I was surfing, I found an article The Schwarzschild solution contains three problems, which can be easily solved - Journal of King Saud University - Science ABUNDANCE ESTIMATION IN AN ARID ENVIRONMENT https://jksus.org/the-schwarzschild-solution-contains-three-problems-which-can-be-easily-solved/ that has the derivation of a line element as a corrected version of the Schwarzschild solution to Einstein’s field equation. This article's date received is 2022-11-15...
Back
Top