- #1
kankerfist
- 32
- 0
I numbered each reagent and product so you can point and laugh accurately. Any tips would be awesome!
Is Converting a Secondary Amine to a Primary Amine Possible with This Route?
- Thread starter kankerfist
- Start date
-
- Tags
- Synthesis
AI Thread Summary
Converting a secondary amine to a primary amine using the proposed route may yield limited results due to its complexity. The discussion emphasizes the importance of identifying effective methods specifically for this conversion. Creating a double bond is suggested as a viable initial step, followed by inducing a carbon-nitrogen double bond, particularly when conjugated with a benzene ring. Participants are encouraged to review the numbered reagents and products for accuracy. Overall, the conversation highlights the need for more efficient strategies in amine conversion.
I numbered each reagent and product so you can point and laugh accurately. Any tips would be awesome!
- #2
kankerfist
- 32
- 0
I don't really need a full walkthrough, but if any you you guys spot a product/reagent 1-19 that you notice is right or wrong then please let me know :)
- #3
GCT
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
- 1,745
- 0
The route seems excessive, you won't get a significant yield with it, the significance here is converting a secondary amine to a primary amine, you should search for methods that have to do with this topic in general.
You're approach of creating the double bond seems to be a good initial step, the next one would be to induce the carbon nitrogen double bond since it is more favorable when its conjugated with the Benzene ring.
You're approach of creating the double bond seems to be a good initial step, the next one would be to induce the carbon nitrogen double bond since it is more favorable when its conjugated with the Benzene ring.
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed.
[![question with rate laws][1]][1]
Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as:
$$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$
my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to?
what I mean here is, whether
$$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$
or is it
$$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ?
The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
Similar threads
Hot Threads
-
Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem
- Started by palaphys
- Replies: 12
- Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
-
Biology Prove that evolution is constant (Provide at least two arguments to support your position)
- Started by yo yo
- Replies: 24
- Biology and Chemistry Homework Help
Recent Insights
-
Insights Quantum Entanglement is a Kinematic Fact, not a Dynamical Effect
- Started by Greg Bernhardt
- Replies: 7
- Quantum Physics
-
Insights What Exactly is Dirac’s Delta Function? - Insight
- Started by Greg Bernhardt
- Replies: 0
- General Math
-
Insights Relativator (Circular Slide-Rule): Simulated with Desmos - Insight
- Started by Greg Bernhardt
- Replies: 1
- Special and General Relativity
-
Insights Fixing Things Which Can Go Wrong With Complex Numbers
- Started by PAllen
- Replies: 7
- General Math
-
Insights Fermat's Last Theorem
- Started by fresh_42
- Replies: 91
- General Math
-
Insights Why Vector Spaces Explain The World: A Historical Perspective
- Started by fresh_42
- Replies: 0
- General Math