Is Electric Potential Highest Between Two Positive Point Charges?

AI Thread Summary
Electric potential is highest at a point along the line between two positive point charges, but it decreases as one approaches either charge. The potential exhibits a minimum between the charges, increasing as the distance to either charge decreases. The formula for electric potential indicates that it approaches infinity as the distance from a charge approaches zero. Since both charges are positive, their contributions to the potential are always positive, ensuring the minimum value is never zero. Understanding these concepts is crucial for analyzing electric fields and potentials in physics.
curiousjoe94
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
Say you have two point charges, both are positive. Would I be correct in thinking that electric potential (V) would be highest at some point along the line between those two point charges, and then decrease as we get closer to each of the charges?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Potential blows up near charges (upside-down funnels glued together). There is a saddle point on the line segment between the charges (where the glue is), perhaps that was the point you were thinking of. If we are constrained to the line segment connecting the two charges, then there is a minimum in between, and it increases as you move closer to either of the charges.
 
No. Look at the formula for the potential due to a point charge. What happens to the potential as the distance from the charge approaches 0?
 
algebrat said:
Potential blows up near charges (upside-down funnels glued together). There is a saddle point on the line segment between the charges (where the glue is), perhaps that was the point you were thinking of. If we are constrained to the line segment connecting the two charges, then there is a minimum in between, and it increases as you move closer to either of the charges.

I get it now. You say there's a minimum between the two charges, would it correct to assume this would never be zero?
 
curiousjoe94 said:
I get it now. You say there's a minimum between the two charges, would it correct to assume this would never be zero?

Yes, since both contributions to the potential are positive, kq/|r|+kq/|r|
 
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Calculation of Tensile Forces in Piston-Type Water-Lifting Devices at Elevated Locations'
Figure 1 Overall Structure Diagram Figure 2: Top view of the piston when it is cylindrical A circular opening is created at a height of 5 meters above the water surface. Inside this opening is a sleeve-type piston with a cross-sectional area of 1 square meter. The piston is pulled to the right at a constant speed. The pulling force is(Figure 2): F = ρshg = 1000 × 1 × 5 × 10 = 50,000 N. Figure 3: Modifying the structure to incorporate a fixed internal piston When I modify the piston...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top