Is f a Surjective and Injective Isomorphism from HxN to HN in G?

  • Thread starter Thread starter mathmajor2013
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Isomorphism
mathmajor2013
Messages
26
Reaction score
0
Let G be a group, H a normal subgroup, N a normal subgroup, and H intersect N = {e}. Let H x N be the direct product of H and N. Prove that f: HxN->G given by f((h,n))=hn is an isomorphism from HxN to the subgroup HN of G.
Hint: For all h in H and n in N, hn=nh.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
This looks a lot like a homework/coursework question. This really should belong there instead of the main forums...

To the point: what have you tried already?
 
I am confused how to start this problem. To first show it is a homomorphism, is f((h,n)(h',n'))=f((hh',nn'))?
 
mathmajor2013 said:
I am confused how to start this problem. To first show it is a homomorphism, is f((h,n)(h',n'))=f((hh',nn'))?

Yes, that step is already correct. Now apply the definition of f...
 
Right the homomorphism part is easy now. Am I able to use the pigeonhole principle for the isomorphic part? That is, are HxN and HN the same size? It seems like they are since H intersect N is only the identity.
 
It might be tricky to see that they are thesame size. Isn't easier to show that f is surjective and injective?
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top