Is F=Kx Always Necessary for Spring Forces?

  • Thread starter Thread starter navneet9431
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Force Spring
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on whether the applied force F must equal the spring force kx in spring dynamics. It clarifies that F can be a separate force acting on the mass, independent of the spring force. The relationship F = kx holds true only under specific conditions, such as when the mass is stationary or moving at constant velocity, indicating equilibrium. If F exceeds kx, the mass accelerates, while if F is less than kx, the spring exerts a force that pulls the mass back. Overall, the equality of F and kx is not a universal requirement but depends on the system's state.
navneet9431
Gold Member
Messages
107
Reaction score
9
Screenshot_2018-10-16-00-42-21-803_com.hashlearn.now.jpg

Is it necessary that the applied force F is equal to the spring force 'kx'?
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_2018-10-16-00-42-21-803_com.hashlearn.now.jpg
    Screenshot_2018-10-16-00-42-21-803_com.hashlearn.now.jpg
    11.9 KB · Views: 868
Physics news on Phys.org
navneet9431 said:
Is it necessary that the applied force F is equal to the spring force 'kx'?
Are you trying to invoke Newton's 2nd law or Newton's 3rd law? What, if anything, do either have to say about the situation?
 
I am not trying to invoke any law
jbriggs444 said:
Are you trying to invoke Newton's 2nd law or Newton's 3rd law? What, if anything, do either have to say about the situation?
 
Is the mass stationary?
 
No
sophiecentaur said:
Is the mass stationary?
 
navneet9431 said:
View attachment 232217
Is it necessary that the applied force F is equal to the spring force 'kx'?
The way you've drawn the picture, it looks like F is a separate force applied to the mass, not the spring force. You'll have to tell us what the drawing means - you drew it! (presumably).
 
navneet9431 said:
No
Make the spring as weak as you like. Would F be zero?
 
Yes,F(on right) is a separate force applied to mass m other than the spring force acting on the left side.
russ_watters said:
The way you've drawn the picture, it looks like F is a separate force applied to the mass, not the spring force. You'll have to tell us what the drawing means - you drew it! (presumably).
 
Please write down for us your Newton's 2d law force balance equation on the mass M.
 
  • #10
F-kx=ma
Chestermiller said:
Please write down for us your Newton's 2d law force balance equation on the mass M.
 
  • #11
navneet9431 said:
F-kx=ma
Perfect. Does that answer your question?
 
  • Like
Likes navneet9431 and russ_watters
  • #12
navneet9431 said:
Yes,F(on right) is a separate force applied to mass m other than the spring force acting on the left side.
In that case it can have literally any value you choose to give it.
 
  • #13
So it means that F=/=kx
Chestermiller said:
Perfect. Does that answer your question?
 
  • #14
But is it possible that F=kx in any condition?
 
  • #15
navneet9431 said:
But is it possible that F=kx in any condition?

If the mass is stationary, or if F is applied in such a way that the mass is moving at a constant velocity. Look at the equation you wrote. What is "a" under these two situations?

Zz.
 
  • Like
Likes navneet9431
  • #16
Thanks
ZapperZ said:
If the mass is stationary, or if F is applied in such a way that the mass is moving at a constant velocity.

Zz.
 
  • #17
navneet9431 said:
But is it possible that F=kx in any condition?

YOU will choose that.

If you choose |F|>|kx|, then m won't be at rest, but will have a constant acceleration rightwards.
If |F| = |kx|, then you have achieved an equilibrium, nothing moves. (In lab, this is how we calculate spring constant, where F=mg:biggrin:)

If |F| < |kx|, then you will have the spring pulling m leftwards.
 
  • Like
Likes sophiecentaur
Back
Top