Are you trying to invoke Newton's 2nd law or Newton's 3rd law? What, if anything, do either have to say about the situation?navneet9431 said:Is it necessary that the applied force F is equal to the spring force 'kx'?
jbriggs444 said:Are you trying to invoke Newton's 2nd law or Newton's 3rd law? What, if anything, do either have to say about the situation?
sophiecentaur said:Is the mass stationary?
The way you've drawn the picture, it looks like F is a separate force applied to the mass, not the spring force. You'll have to tell us what the drawing means - you drew it! (presumably).navneet9431 said:View attachment 232217
Is it necessary that the applied force F is equal to the spring force 'kx'?
Make the spring as weak as you like. Would F be zero?navneet9431 said:No
russ_watters said:The way you've drawn the picture, it looks like F is a separate force applied to the mass, not the spring force. You'll have to tell us what the drawing means - you drew it! (presumably).
Chestermiller said:Please write down for us your Newton's 2d law force balance equation on the mass M.
Perfect. Does that answer your question?navneet9431 said:F-kx=ma
In that case it can have literally any value you choose to give it.navneet9431 said:Yes,F(on right) is a separate force applied to mass m other than the spring force acting on the left side.
Chestermiller said:Perfect. Does that answer your question?
navneet9431 said:But is it possible that F=kx in any condition?
ZapperZ said:If the mass is stationary, or if F is applied in such a way that the mass is moving at a constant velocity.
Zz.
navneet9431 said:But is it possible that F=kx in any condition?