Is Friction the Reason Spinning Tops Eventually Stop Rotating?

  • Thread starter Thread starter avito009
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inertia Spinning
AI Thread Summary
Friction is identified as the external torque that causes a spinning top to eventually stop rotating, despite Newton's law stating that an object in motion will remain in motion unless acted upon by an external force. The interaction between the top and the surface it spins on creates friction at the point of contact, which is not negligible. This frictional force gradually reduces the top's angular velocity until it ceases to spin. The discussion highlights the importance of understanding friction's role in rotational motion. Ultimately, friction is a key factor in the cessation of a spinning top's movement.
avito009
Messages
184
Reaction score
4
As per Newton an object that is rotating at constant angular velocity will remain rotating unless it is acted upon by an external torque.

But we know that a top will stop rotating after some time. So does that mean that the external torque is the friction of the floor on which the top rotates?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, Because the point of contact between the spinning top and the surface is not an infinitesimal point.
 

Thread '1:1 versus 2:1 Mechanical Advantage debate'

The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
View full post »

Thread 'Newton's first law?'

Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
View full post »
Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Thread 'Beam on an inclined plane'

Hello! I have a question regarding a beam on an inclined plane. I was considering a beam resting on two supports attached to an inclined plane. I was almost sure that the lower support must be more loaded. My imagination about this problem is shown in the picture below. Here is how I wrote the condition of equilibrium forces: $$ \begin{cases} F_{g\parallel}=F_{t1}+F_{t2}, \\ F_{g\perp}=F_{r1}+F_{r2} \end{cases}. $$ On the other hand...
View full post »

Similar threads

B The physics of flywheel launchers (like tennis ball shooters)
2
Replies
60
Views
4K
A Order of rotations due to torque in 3DOF in simulations
Replies
2
Views
1K
On Bodies Moving with a Constant Velocity
Replies
11
Views
1K
The conservation of angular momentum
Replies
9
Views
5K
I Solving Wheel Coming to a Stop: FBD, Friction & Hysteresis
Replies
22
Views
4K
A Modeling the damping of a physical rigid pendulum
Replies
1
Views
2K
Moment of inertia where mass and torque are at a different positions
2
Replies
69
Views
5K
Torque Equation about a point other than point of rotation
Replies
4
Views
4K
Rotating body viewed from its own rotating ref. frame, then perturbed
Replies
2
Views
1K
Force acting during rotating a disc
Replies
3
Views
4K

Hot Threads

Recent Insights

Back
Top